Skip to main content

Possible role of the gut microbiota in the pathogenesis of anorexia nervosa

Abstract

Anorexia nervosa (AN), an eating disorder, is characterized by extreme weight loss and fear of weight gain. Psychosocial factors are thought to play important roles in the development and progression of AN; however, biological factors also presumably contribute to eating disorders. Recent evidence has shown that the gut microbiota plays an important role in pathogenesis of neuropsychiatric disorders including AN. In this article, we describe the possible role of the gut microbiota in the development and persistence of AN, based on the latest research works, including those of our group.

Introduction

More than 1000 species of microbes are present in the human gut. They are collectively called the gut microbiota and are involved in various host functions [1,2,3]. Accumulated evidence suggests that gut microbes can play a role not only in regulating body weight [4] but also in the development and exacerbation of neuropsychiatric diseases [5,6,7,8,9].

Anorexia nervosa (AN) is an eating disorder characterized by extreme weight loss and a fear of weight gain [10, 11]. In general, psychosocial issues are reported to play important roles in the pathology of AN [12,13,14]; however, biological factors are also presumed to contribute to this pathological process [15, 16]. Recently, the gut microbiota has emerged as an important factor affecting AN pathogenesis.

In the first two sections of this article, we review a historical view that recognizes the commensal microbiota as an important factor affecting weight control and behavioral characteristics. Then, we discuss recent topics about this theme based on the latest research works, including those of our group. Unlike comprehensive systematic reviews and metanalyses [17, 18] that have been published recently, our aim is to use information from existing literature to generate testable hypotheses regarding the role of the gut microbiota in AN pathogenesis. By doing so, we hope to encourage researchers to conduct cause-effect studies about eating disorders based on realistic mechanistic hypotheses.

Gut microbes exert a significant impact on body weight gain

The fact that gut bacteria are involved in weight control and growth is not a novel finding, but is a long known basic theory in livestock industries. For example, antibiotics have often been used to promote livestock growth [19, 20], called antibiotic-induced growth promotion (AIGP). The use of antibiotics for AIGP is still being exploited in several countries, including the US and Japan. The precise mechanism for AIGP is unclear, but the fact that growth promotion is absent when administering antibiotics to germ-free animals deficient in bacteria [21, 22], indicates that the gut microbiota plays a critical role in this promoting effect [20]. Gordon et al. [23,24,25] used an elegant method of fecal transplantation to demonstrate that the gut microbiota is critically important for regulating body weight. Furthermore, another group [26] showed that transplantation of Christensenella minuta into mice with an obese phenotype suppressed weight gain. Thus, these findings indicate that the gut microbiota can affect body weight regulation by modulating the gut microbial ecology.

Commensal microbes affect not only host stress response but also host behaviors

When exposed to stress stimuli, the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis is activated to maintain homeostasis of the body [27]. Interestingly, the HPA axis is known to be affected by both genetic determinants and postnatal environmental factors during infancy [28, 29]. Because gut microbes are an important environmental factor, we hypothesized that the gut microbiota plays a role in host stress responses. In 2004, we first demonstrated that gut microbes determine the HPA response to stressors, using germ-free (GF) and gnotobiotic mice [30]. The degree of plasma ACTH and corticosterone elevation in response to 1-h restraint stress was higher in GF mice than in specific pathogen free (SPF) mice. Furthermore, as summarized in Table 1, mono-association with B. infantis, a representative inhabitant of the neonate gut, decreased the HPA stress response to SPF, while mono-association with Bacteroides vulgatus had no effect. The hormonal stress response of rabbit-derived enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC)-monoassociated mice was substantially higher than that of GF mice, although such an exaggerated response was not found in mice with an EPEC mutant strain, ΔTir [31], which was uninternalized due to defects in the translocated intimin receptor.

Table 1 Effects of restraint stress (RS) on plasma ACTH and the corticosterone levels of gnotobiotic mice

The finding that commensal bacteria can substantially affect the HPA stress response later in life raises an interesting question about whether gut bacteria can change host behavior. This question has been addressed in the past decade by several independent groups, including our own [32,33,34,35,36,37]. The commensal microbiota is a crucial factor in modulating the host’s behavioral profile. For example, we developed a reliable method to accurately analyze the behavior of GF mice maintained in an isolator [35]. This method enabled us to evaluate GF animal behavior without the risk of exposure to contamination. Using this system, GF mice were found to be more active and anxious than EX-GF mice that were transplanted with a normal SPF microbiota, based on open-field and marble-burying tests (Table 2). Colonization with B. infantis decreased the locomotor activity to the EX-GF level but had little effect on the anxiety levels. In contrast, mono-association with Clostridium coccoides reduced anxiety levels; however, it did not affect locomotor activity [35].

Table 2 Transplantation of normal gut microbiota renders germ-free (GF) mice less active and anxious

Collectively, these results indicate that gut microbiota can exert a substantial effect on the behavioral phenotype as well as the ability of the host to respond to stressors.

Possible relation between gut microbiota and AN pathologies

Patients with AN who have extremely low body weight often show marked resistance to weight gain in response to calorie intake; therefore, they usually require more calories to increase body weight than healthy subjects with normal weight [38,39,40]. Several factors such as increased physical activity [41] and diet-induced thermogenesis [42] are suggested to be involved in this phenomenon; however, the precise mechanisms for this are largely unknown. In addition, other important complications of AN include comorbid anxiety and depressive disorders. A well-known study, “the Minnesota Starvation Experiment” [43], which was performed during World War II, clearly showed that starvation significantly affected both physical and psychological conditions [43, 44]. Thirty-six volunteers who refused military service for religious reasons participated in this study. They were psychologically resilient before the experiment; however, most experienced periods of severe emotional distress during the study. This indicates that some psychiatric symptoms found in patients with AN could be explained by the effects of starvation. However, how and to what extent starvation affects the psychological and social functioning of patients with AN remain largely unknown.

Considering the emerging effects of gut microbes on body weight control or behavioral phenotypes, we speculated that commensal bacteria may play an important role in the onset and exacerbation of AN. Undoubtedly, patients’ premorbid traits and psychosocial stressors are critical to the onset of AN. Prolonged physiological and psychological stress, including severe weight loss and extreme dietary habits, may influence the composition of the gut microbiota and subsequently induce “gut dysbiosis.” This disturbed bacterial community may contribute to a decrease in food efficiency or behavioral abnormalities. For example, hyperactivity, one such abnormal behavior, may further strengthen the resistance to weight gain.

Gut dysbiosis in patients with AN

Several researchers have investigated whether gut dysbiosis exists in the gut of patients with AN and have shown that patients with AN show “dysbiosis”, abnormal features of gut microbiota [45,46,47,48]. Armougom et al. [45] reported that Methanobrevibacter smithii was more frequently detected in patients with AN than those with low body weight due to diseases other than AN. Interestingly, these methanogenic archaea are often found in patients with constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome [49, 50]. Mack et al. [47] found that the ratio of mucin-degrading bacteria to Clostridium cluster I, XI, and XVIII in an AN group was higher and the butyric acid-producing genus Roseburia was lower than that of the intestinal flora of normal body weight subjects. In addition, the proportion of Bacteroidetes phylum in patients with AN was significantly reduced compared to normal-weight subjects and did not recover after weight gain. Our group [48] used the intestinal bacterial analysis system YIF-SCAN® that was developed by Yakult Central Laboratory to examine the intestinal bacteria of female subjects with AN and age-matched healthy women. The total bacterial, Clostridium coccoides, Clostridium leptum, Bacteroides fragilis, and Streptococcus counts were significantly lower in the AN group than the control group. The detection rate of the Lactobacillus plantarum subgroup was significantly lower in the AN group than in the control group. Based on 16S rRNA sequencing methods, we also reported a lower relative abundance of the phylum Bacteroidetes in patients with AN than healthy age-matched controls [51]. As summarized in Table 3, several recently published papers [52,53,54,55,56,57] have also shown changes in gut microbial ecology at the phylum or genus levels; however, no specific bacteria were identified among these reports. Thus, although the results differ depending on the patient’s background or analytical methods, “gut dysbiosis” is consistently observed in patients with AN.

Table 3 Gut microbial composition of patients with anorexia nervosa (AN)

Can gut dysbiosis contribute to AN pathologies: analyses using gnotobiotic animal models

The existence of gut dysbiosis does not always relate to impaired functional outcomes; namely, such disturbed microbiota may not be a causal factor contributing to AN pathologies but an epiphenomenon resulting from lengthy starvation. To test this, we transplanted the gut microbiota of patients with AN into GF mice to establish gnotobiotic mice (gAN) whose microbiota consisted of the intestinal microbiota of patients with AN [51]. The gAN mice showed a significantly decreased weight gain compared with the gnotobiotic mice (gHC) transplanted with the gut microbiota of healthy women. Similarly, food efficiency (weight gain/food intake) was also lower in the gAN mice than in the gHC mice. Moreover, the gAN mice also exhibited increased anxiety-like behaviors relative to the gHC mice, when evaluated by open field and marble-burying tests. Interestingly, marble-burying behaviors displayed the highest correlation with the relative abundance of the genus Bacteroides. Moreover, the administration of Bacteroides vulgatus, which belongs to the genus Bacteroides and is a predominant species of the Bacteroides fragilis group in adult humans [58], reversed the behavioral abnormalities in the gAN mice.

These results indicate that some characteristic features of patients with AN can be reproduced by transplanting the AN gut microbiota. Bacteria, such as Bacteroides vulgatus, may play a protective role against the development of pathologies specific to patients with AN. Recently, Glenny et al. [59] reported that fecal transplantation from patients with AN exerted no significant effects on body weight in GF mice. A precise reason for this discrepant result is unclear; however, this may be related to the methodology of fecal transplantation, which involved the use of frozen feces, as they suggested. Therefore, the results of our study, which utilized fresh feces, should be validated by future experiments using a larger number of mouse colonies and different human donors.

Molecules potentially involved in AN pathology: analyses using serum metabolome profiles

The above results based on animal experiments provide valuable information about some pathological features of AN; nonetheless, they are inapplicable to human conditions. Therefore, we performed metabolome analyses using human materials.

Uremic toxins and related compounds

We detected 275 metabolites in serum samples from patients with AN and healthy controls [60]. Although the patients with AN enrolled in this study failed to show any apparent renal dysfunction, the serum levels of guanidinosuccinic acid and N2-phenylacetylglutamine, a uremic toxin, were significantly higher in the patients with AN restricting type (ANR). Therefore, precise quantification of uremic toxins was performed using selected-reaction monitoring of liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry at Kureha Corporation, as reported [61,62,63]. The serum p-cresol (PCS), indole-3-acetic acid, and phenyl sulfate levels were significantly higher in an AN group than in an age-matched control group [60]. Because these uremic toxins are produced by gut microbes, gut microbes may contribute to increased uremic toxins. This possibility was supported by our results showing that serum PCS levels in an ANR group (but not a control group) correlated positively with the abundance of a Clostridium coccoides group or a Clostridium leptum subgroup [60]. Interestingly, in another cohort of ANR patients [51], the relative abundance of members of the genus Blautia was significantly higher in ANR patients than in age-matched healthy women. Previously, it was reported that the genus Blautia was the most abundant subgroup in human intestinal Clostridium coccoides group populations that were identified using the YIF-SCAN system [64]. These findings suggest that increased populations of certain bacteria belonging to the genus Blautia may help elevate the serum uremic toxin levels of patients with ANR.

Yokoyama et al. [65] reported that PCS derived from gut microbes may slow the growth of weanling pigs and that inhibiting PCS production with antibiotics may be one of the mechanisms by which antibiotics can induce AIGP [20]. The compound was also found to play a role in the development and progression of neuropsychiatric diseases, such as autism [66,67,68]. For example, Hsaio et al. [69] suggested that 4-ethylphenylsulfate, a sulfated compound of PCS, may promote the development of autistic-like behavior in a mouse model with maternal immune activation. Nonetheless, whether PCS or its related compounds can affect weight gain and behavioral characteristics of patients with AN remains unclear.

Amino acids: tryptophan and related molecules may be key players responsible for AN-specific pathologies

Serum metabolomic measurement showed another interesting finding regarding AN. Serum levels of 10 amino acids, including asparagine, tyrosine, isoleucine, alanine, histidine, leucine, methionine, proline, tryptophan (TRP), and valine, were lower in patients with AN than age-matched healthy women, when the false-discovery rate corrected p-value was set at less than 0.1. According to pathway enrichment analyses, the pathway of “phenylalanine, tyrosine, and TRP biosynthesis” was ranked as the highest impact score [60].

Since Kaye’s pioneering works [70, 71], TRP has been demonstrated to play an important role in the development and maintenance of AN. In fact, in malnourished and emaciated individuals with AN, reduced plasma TRP availability [72,73,74] and reduced 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid levels in the CSF have been reported [71]. This decreased serotonergic system may be involved in AN pathology by changing the host behavior. Indeed, increased locomotor activity, hyperactivity, is often seen in subjects with AN and has been regarded as a key characteristic of the disorder [75,76,77]. Interestingly, Uchida et al. [78] reported that mice fed TRP-limited diets exhibited increased locomotor activity. This indicates that a dearth of tryptophan due to decreased dietary intake can exacerbate AN-specific behavioral abnormalities, such as hyperactivity, via modulating the brain 5-HT system, subsequently aggravating poor weight gain by increasing exercise-induced calorie consumption. This series of events eventually forms a vicious cycle, which may substantially contribute to the perpetuation of AN pathology.

Future perspectives

Increasing attention has been paid to the role of gut microbiota in AN. However, in terms of gut microbes, the following questions remain to be addressed.

  1. 1)

    There is a pressing need to develop more effective therapeutics for adult patients with AN who are refractory to usual treatments. Probiotics may be a useful adjunctive therapy to achieve better weight gain and maintain appropriate mental conditions. This is clinically important and should be addressed by randomized controlled studies with large sample sizes.

  2. 2)

    Some gut bacteria metabolize indigestible dietary fiber or oligosaccharides and produce short chain fatty acids (SCFAs), such as acetate, propionate, and butylate [79]. SCFAs are now considered to be one of the key molecules that can affect neuropsychiatric functions [5, 80]. Such bacteria-generated SCFAs exert an anxiolytic effect in mice [81, 82]; therefore, pre- or pro-biotic interventions that have an ability to increase fecal SCFAs may be a therapeutic option to improve mental conditions in patients with AN.

  3. 3)

    The majority of gut bacteria resides in the colon; therefore, the colonic bacteria have been extensively studied. However, how and to what extent microbes residing in the jejunum or ileum can contribute to host pathophysiology are largely unknown and should be clarified. For example, small intestinal bacterial overgrowth has been found to occur under some pathological conditions [83], and because amino acids, including tryptophan, are usually absorbed via transporters present in the upper GI tract [84, 85], it is theoretically possible that bacteria in the small intestine may play a role in the development and exacerbation of AN pathology by modulating the ability of the microbes to metabolize diet- or host-derived proteins. These bacteria may confer protection against AN-specific behavioral abnormalities by producing amino acids such as tryptophan.

  4. 4)

    Recently, some species of gut microbes have been reported to synthesize d-amino acids as well as l-amino acids [86, 87]. D-serine is known to activate the N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor as its co-agonist [88]. Therefore, D-amino acids, such as d-tryptophan in the gut lumen, may exert a substantial effect on brain function similar to D-serine.

Figure 1 shows our working hypothesis concerning the possible role of the gut microbiota in the development and perpetuation of AN.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Possible role of the gut microbiota in the pathogenesis of anorexia nervosa (AN). Premorbid traits, such as compulsive personality, perfectionism, and drive for thinness, and psychosocial stressors play a crucial role in AN development [74]. Consequently, changes in dietary habits and altered intake of food ingredients, induced by dieting, lead to a dearth of essential amino acids [60] and “gut dysbiosis” [45,46,47,48, 51,52,53,54,55,56]. Physical and psychological stresses accompanying extreme weight loss may also affect the disturbed microbial ecology of the gut [89, 90]. Moreover, gut dysbiosis, together with the stresses, also induces constipation by impairing gut motility function [49, 50]. Prolonged constipation with gut dysbiosis elevates uremic toxins [60], such as p-cresol, which is possibly involved in poor weight gain [65] and psychiatric symptoms [69]. Decreased short chain fatty acids (SCFA), especially acetate, derived from gut dysbiosis [48] may also contribute to impaired weight control [79] and persistent anxiety [81, 82]. Finally, hyperactivity, a key characteristic of AN [75,76,77], is potentially induced by an insufficient intake of essential amino acids, such as tryptophan, and further perpetuates low body weight via increasing calorie expenditure

Conclusion

The theory of “autointoxication,” which states that toxins generated in the gut exert a negative impact on brain function, inducing depression, anxiety, and other mental diseases [91,92,93], was long regarded as an irrational concept. Only recently has scientific research been conducted on the topic, and it has become extensively studied. Further developments in this field could elucidate the role of gut microbes in the pathogenesis of eating disorders and further provide a strong rationale for probiotic intervention as a treatment for patients with AN.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. Clemente JC, Ursell LK, Parfrey LW, Knight R. The impact of the gut microbiota on human health: an integrative view. Cell. 2012;148(6):1258–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.035.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Lozupone CA, Stombaugh JI, Gordon JI, Jansson JK, Knight R. Diversity, stability and resilience of the human gut microbiota. Nature. 2012;489(7415):220–30. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11550.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Nicholson JK, Holmes E, Kinross J, Burcelin R, Gibson G, Jia W, et al. Host-gut microbiota metabolic interactions. Science. 2012;336(6086):1262–7. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1223813.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dabke K, Hendrick G, Devkota S. The gut microbiome and metabolic syndrome. J Clin Invest. 2019;129(10):4050–7. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI129194.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Sampson TR, Debelius JW, Thron T, Janssen S, Shastri GG, Ilhan ZE, et al. Gut microbiota regulate motor deficits and neuroinflammation in a model of parkinson’s disease. Cell. 2016;167:1469–80.e12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.018.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Sharon G, Sampson TR, Geschwind DH, Mazmanian SK. The central nervous system and the gut microbiome. Cell. 2016;167(4):915–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.027.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Jiang H, Ling Z, Zhang Y, Mao H, Ma Z, Yin Y, et al. Altered fecal microbiota composition in patients with major depressive disorder. Brain Behav Immun. 2015;48:186–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2015.03.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Miyake S, Kim S, Suda W, Oshima K, Nakamura M, Matsuoka T, et al. Dysbiosis in the gut microbiota of patients with multiple sclerosis, with a striking depletion of species belonging to clostridia XIVa and IV clusters. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0137429. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137429.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Tremlett H, Bauer KC, Appel-Cresswell S, Finlay BB, Waubant E. The gut microbiome in human neurological disease: a review. Ann Neurol. 2017;81(3):369–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24901.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zipfel S, Löwe B, Reas DL, Deter HC, Herzog W. Long-term prognosis in anorexia nervosa: lessons from a 21-year follow-up study. Lancet. 2000;355(9205):721–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(99)05363-5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zipfel S, Giel KE, Bulik CM, Hay P, Schmidt U. Anorexia nervosa: aetiology, assessment, and treatment. Lancet Psychiatry. 2015;2(12):1099–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00356-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Treasure J, Claudino AM, Zucker N. Eating disorders. Lancet. 2010;375(9714):583–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61748-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fairburn CG, Harrison PJ. Eating disorders. Lancet. 2003;361(9355):407–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12378-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fairburn CG, Cooper Z, Doll HA, Welch SL. Risk factors for anorexia nervosa: three integrated case-control comparisons. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56(5):468–76. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.56.5.468.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Couzin-Frankel J. Rethinking anorexia: challenging long-standing theories about the eating disorder, new research suggests biology is a powerful driver. Science. 2020;368(6487):124–7. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.368.6487.124.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schorr M, Miller KK. The endocrine manifestations of anorexia nervosa: mechanisms and management. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2017;13(3):174–86. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2016.175.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Di Lodovico L, Mondot S, Doré J, Mack I, Hanachi M, Gorwood P. Anorexia nervosa and gut microbiota: a systematic review and quantitative synthesis of pooled microbiological data. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacology Biol Psychiatry. 2021;106:110114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.110114.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Roubalová R, Procházková P, Papežová H, Smitka K, Bilej M, Tlaskalová-Hogenová H. Anorexia nervosa: gut microbiota-immune-brain interactions. Clin Nutr. 2020;39(3):676–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2019.03.023.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Moore PR, Evenson A. Use of sulfasuxidine, streptothricin, and streptomycin in nutritional studies with the chick. J Biol Chem. 1946;165(2):437–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(17)41154-9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dibner JJ, Richards JD. Antibiotic growth promoters in agriculture: history and mode of action. Poult Sci. 2005;84(4):634–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.4.634.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Coates M, Fuller R, Harrison G, Lev M, Suffolk S. A comparison of the growth of chicks in the Gustafsson germ-free apparatus and in a conventional environment, with and without dietary supplements of penicillin. Br J Nutr. 1963;17(1):141–50. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19630015.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Brown K, Zaytsoff SJM, Uwiera RRE, Inglis GD. Antimicrobial growth promoters modulate host responses in mice with a defined intestinal microbiota. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38377.

  23. Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Mahowald MA, Magrini V, Mardis ER, Gordon JI. An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature. 2006;444(7122):1027–31. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05414.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ley R, Turnbaugh P, Klein S, Gordon J. Microbial ecology: human gut microbes associated with obesity. Nature. 2006;444(7122):1022–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature4441021a.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ridaura VK, Faith JJ, Rey FE, Cheng J, Duncan AE, Kau AL, et al. Gut microbiota from twins discordant for obesity modulate metabolism in mice. Science. 2013;341(6150):1241214. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1241214.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Goodrich JK, Waters JL, Poole AC, Sutter JL, Koren O, Blekhman R, et al. Human genetics shape the gut microbiome. Cell. 2014;159(4):789–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.053.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Tsigos C, Chrousos GP. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, neuroendocrine factors and stress. J Psychosom Res. 2002;53(4):865–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00429-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Francis D, Diorio J, Liu D, Meaney MJ. Nongenomic transmission across generations of maternal behavior and stress responses in the rat. Science. 1999;286(5442):1155–8. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5442.1155.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu D, Diorio J, Tannenbaum B, Caldji C, Francis D, Freedman A, et al. Maternal care, hippocampal glucocorticoid receptors, and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal responses to stress. Science. 1997;277(5332):1659–62. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5332.1659.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sudo N, Chida Y, Aiba Y, Sonoda J, Oyama N, Yu X-N, et al. Postnatal microbial colonization programs the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal system for stress response in mice. J Physiol. 2004;558(1):263–75. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2004.063388.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Kenny B, DeVinney R, Stein M, Reinscheid D, Frey E, Finlay B. Enteropathogenic E. Coli (EPEC) transfers its receptor for intimate adherence into mammalian cells. Cell 1997;91:511–520, 4, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80437-7.

  32. Neufeld KM, Kang N, Bienenstock J, Foster JA. Reduced anxiety-like behavior and central neurochemical change in germ-free mice. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011;23(3):255–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2982.2010.01620.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Heijtz RD, Wang S, Anuar F, Qian Y, Bjorkholm B, Samuelsson A, et al. Normal gut microbiota modulates brain development and behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108(7):3047–52. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010529108.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Ezenwa VO, Gerardo NM, Inouye DW, Medina M, Xavier JB. Animal behavior and the microbiome. Science. 2012;338(6104):198–9. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1227412.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Nishino R, Mikami K, Takahashi H, Tomonaga S, Furuse M, Hiramoto T, et al. Commensal microbiota modulate murine behaviors in a strictly contamination-free environment confirmed by culture-based methods. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013;25(6):521–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12110.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Desbonnet L, Clarke G, Shanahan F, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Microbiota is essential for social development in the mouse. Mol Psychiatry. 2014;19(2):146–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2013.65.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. De Palma G, Blennerhassett P, Lu J, Deng Y, Park AJ, Green W, et al. Microbiota and host determinants of behavioural phenotype in maternally separated mice. Nat Commun. 2015;6(1):7735. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8735.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Walker J, Roberts SL, Halmi KA, Goldberg SC. Caloric requirements for weight gain in anorexia nervosa. Am J Clin Nutr. 1979;32(7):1396–400. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/32.7.1396.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Weltzin TE, Fernstrom MH, Hansen D, McConaha C, Kaye WH. Abnormal caloric requirements for weight maintenance in patients with anorexia and bulimia nervosa. Am J Psychiatry. 1991;148(12):1675–82. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.148.12.1675.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Marzola E, Nasser JA, Hashim SA, Shih PB, Kaye WH. Nutritional rehabilitation in anorexia nervosa: review of the literature and implications for treatment. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13(1):290. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-13-290.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Kaye WH, Gwirtsman HE, Obarzanek E, George DT. Relative importance of calorie intake needed to gain weight and level of physical activity in anorexia nervosa. Am J Clin Nutr. 1988;47(6):989–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/47.6.989.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Moukaddem M, Boulier A, Apfelbaum M, Rigaud D. Increase in diet-induced thermogenesis at the start of refeeding in severely malnourished anorexia nervosa patients. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;66(1):133–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/66.1.133.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Keys A, Brožek J, Henschel A, Mickelsen O, Taylor HL. The biology of human starvation. Biol Hum Starvation. 1950;1 & 2.

  44. Kalm LM, Semba RD. History of nutrition they starved so that others be better fed: remembering Ancel Keys and the Minnesota experiment. J Nutr. 2005;135(6):1347–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/135.6.1347.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Armougom F, Henry M, Vialettes B, Raccah D, Raoult D. Monitoring bacterial community of human gut microbiota reveals an increase in Lactobacillus in obese patients and methanogens in anorexic patients. PLoS One. 2009;4(9):e7125. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007125.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Kleiman SC, Watson HJ, Bulik-Sullivan EC, Huh EY, Tarantino LM, Bulik CM, et al. The intestinal microbiota in acute anorexia nervosa and during renourishment. Psychosom Med. 2015;77(9):969–81. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0000000000000247.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Mack I, Cuntz U, Grämer C, Niedermaier S, Pohl C, Schwiertz A, et al. Weight gain in anorexia nervosa does not ameliorate the faecal microbiota, branched chain fatty acid profiles, and gastrointestinal complaints. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):26752. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26752.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Morita C, Tsuji H, Hata T, Gondo M, Takakura S, Kawai K, et al. Gut dysbiosis in patients with anorexia nervosa. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0145274. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145274.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Kim G, Deepinder F, Morales W, Hwang L, Weitsman S, Chang C, et al. Methanobrevibacter smithii is the predominant methanogen in patients with constipation-predominant IBS and methane on breath. Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57(12):3213–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10620-012-2197-1.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Ghoshal U, Shukla R, Srivastava D, Ghoshal U. Irritable bowel syndrome, particularly the constipation-predominant form, involves an increase in Methanobrevibacter smithii, which is associated with higher methane production. Gut Liver. 2016;10(6):932–8. https://doi.org/10.5009/GNL15588.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Hata T, Miyata N, Takakura S, Yoshihara K, Asano Y, Kimura-Todani T, et al. The gut microbiome derived from anorexia nervosa patients impairs weight gain and behavioral performance in female mice. Endocrinology. 2019;160(10):2441–52. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2019-00408.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Million M, Angelakis E, Maraninchi M, Henry M, Giorgi R, Valero R, et al. Correlation between body mass index and gut concentrations of Lactobacillus reuteri, Bifidobacterium animalis, Methanobrevibacter smithii and Escherichia coli. Int J Obes. 2013;37(11):1460–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/IJO.2013.20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Borgo F, Riva A, Benetti A, Casiraghi MC, Bertelli S, Garbossa S, et al. Microbiota in anorexia nervosa: the triangle between bacterial species, metabolites and psychological tests. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0179739. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179739.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Mörkl S, Lackner S, Müller W, Gorkiewicz G, Kashofer K, Oberascher A, et al. Gut microbiota and body composition in anorexia nervosa inpatients in comparison to athletes, overweight, obese, and normal weight controls. Int J Eat Disord. 2017;50(12):1421–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/EAT.22801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Mörkl S, Lackner S, Meinitzer A, Mangge H, Lehofer M, Halwachs B, et al. Gut microbiota, dietary intakes and intestinal permeability reflected by serum zonulin in women. Eur J Nutr. 2018;57(8):2985–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00394-018-1784-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Hanachi M, Manichanh C, Schoenenberger A, Pascal V, Levenez F, Cournède N, et al. Altered host-gut microbes symbiosis in severely malnourished anorexia nervosa (AN) patients undergoing enteral nutrition: an explicative factor of functional intestinal disorders. Clin Nutr. 2019;38(5):2304–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CLNU.2018.10.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Skowron K, Kurnik-Łucka M, Dadański E, Bętkowska-Korpała B, Gil K. Backstage of eating disorder-about the biological mechanisms behind the symptoms of anorexia nervosa. Nutrients. 2020;12(9):1–32. https://doi.org/10.3390/NU12092604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Ishikawa E, Matsuki T, Kubota H, Makino H, Sakai T, Oishi K, et al. Ethnic diversity of gut microbiota: species characterization of Bacteroides fragilis group and genus Bifidobacterium in healthy Belgian adults, and comparison with data from Japanese subjects. J Biosci Bioeng. 2013;116(2):265–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2013.02.010.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Glenny EM, Fouladi F, Thomas SA, Bulik-Sullivan EC, Tang Q, Djukic Z, et al. Gut microbial communities from patients with anorexia nervosa do not influence body weight in recipient germ-free mice. Gut Microbes. 2021;13(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2021.1897216.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Miyata N, Hata T, Takakura S, Yoshihara K, Morita C, Mikami K, et al. Metabolomics profile of Japanese female patients with restricting-type anorexia nervosa. Physiol Behav. 2021;228:113204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113204.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Kikuchi K, Itoh Y, Tateoka R, Ezawa A, Murakami K, Niwa T. Metabolomic search for uremic toxins as indicators of the effect of an oral sorbent AST-120 by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2010;878(29):2997–3002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2010.09.006.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Itoh Y, Ezawa A, Kikuchi K, Tsuruta Y, Niwa T. Protein-bound uremic toxins in hemodialysis patients measured by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry and their effects on endothelial ROS production. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2012;403(7):1841–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-012-5929-3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Kikuchi M, Ueno M, Itoh Y, Suda W, Hattori M. Uremic toxin-producing gut microbiota in rats with chronic kidney disease. Nephron. 2017;135(1):51–60. https://doi.org/10.1159/000450619.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Kurakawa T, Ogata K, Matsuda K, Tsuji H, Kubota H, Takada T, et al. Diversity of intestinal Clostridium coccoides group in the Japanese population, as demonstrated by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0126226. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126226.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Yokoyama MT, Tabori C, Miller ER, Hogberg MG. The effects of antibiotics in the weanling pig diet on growth and the excretion of volatile phenolic and aromatic bacterial metabolites. Am J Clin Nutr. 1982;35(6):1417–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/35.6.1417.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Altieri L, Neri C, Sacco R, Curatolo P, Benvenuto A, Muratori F, et al. Urinary p-cresol is elevated in small children with severe autism spectrum disorder. Biomarkers. 2011;16(3):252–60. https://doi.org/10.3109/1354750X.2010.548010.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Gabriele S, Sacco R, Cerullo S, Neri C, Urbani A, Tripi G, et al. Urinary p-cresol is elevated in young French children with autism spectrum disorder: a replication study. Biomarkers. 2014;19(6):463–70. https://doi.org/10.3109/1354750X.2014.936911.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Persico AM, Napolioni V. Urinary p-cresol in autism spectrum disorder. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2013;36:82–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ntt.2012.09.002.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Hsiao EY, McBride SW, Hsien S, Sharon G, Hyde ER, McCue T, et al. Microbiota modulate behavioral and physiological abnormalities associated with neurodevelopmental disorders. Cell. 2013;155(7):1451–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.024.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Kaye WH, Barbarich NC, Putnam K, Gendall KA, Fernstrom J, Fernstrom M, et al. Anxiolytic effects of acute tryptophan depletion in anorexia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord. 2003;33(3):257–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.10135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Kaye WH, Gwirtsman HE, George DT, Jimerson DC, Ebert MH. CSF 5-HIAA concentrations in anorexia nervosa: reduced values in underweight subjects normalize after weight gain. Biol Psychiatry. 1988;23(1):102–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3223(88)90113-8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Attia E, Wolk S, Cooper T, Glasofer D, Walsh BT. Plasma tryptophan during weight restoration in patients with anorexia nervosa. Biol Psychiatry. 2005;57(6):674–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.11.045.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Schweiger U, Warnhoff M, Pahl J, Pirke KM. Effects of carbohydrate and protein meals on plasma large neutral amino acids, glucose, and insulin plasma levels of anorectic patients. Metabolism. 1986;35(10):938–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/0026-0495(86)90058-2.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Kaye WH, Fudge JL, Paulus M. New insights into symptoms and neurocircuit function of anorexia nervosa. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10(8):573–84. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2682.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Klein DA, Mayer LES, Schebendach JE, Walsh BT. Physical activity and cortisol in anorexia nervosa. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2007;32(5):539–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2007.03.007.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Hebebrand J, Exner C, Hebebrand K, Holtkamp C, Casper RC, Remschmidt H, et al. Hyperactivity in patients with anorexia nervosa and in semistarved rats: evidence for a pivotal role of hypoleptinemia. Physiol Behav. 2003;79(1):25–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9384(03)00102-1.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Scheurink AJW, Boersma GJ, Nergårdh R, Södersten P. Neurobiology of hyperactivity and reward: agreeable restlessness in anorexia nervosa. Physiol Behav. 2010;100(5):490–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.03.016.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Uchida S, Kitamoto A, Umeeda H, Nakagawa N, Masushige S, Kida S. Chronic reduction in dietary tryptophan leads to changes in the emotional response to stress in mice. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol. 2005;51(3):175–81. https://doi.org/10.3177/jnsv.51.175.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Hernández MAG, Canfora EE, Jocken JWE, Blaak EE. The short-chain fatty acid acetate in body weight control and insulin sensitivity. Nutrients. 2019;11(8):1943. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11081943.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Erny D, De Angelis ALH, Jaitin D, Wieghofer P, Staszewski O, David E, et al. Host microbiota constantly control maturation and function of microglia in the CNS. Nat Neurosci. 2015;18(7):965–77. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4030.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Kimura-Todani T, Hata T, Miyata N, Takakura S, Yoshihara K, Zhang XT, et al. Dietary delivery of acetate to the colon using acylated starches as a carrier exerts anxiolytic effects in mice. Physiol Behav. 2020;223:113004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113004.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. van de Wouw M, Boehme M, Lyte JM, Wiley N, Strain C, O’Sullivan O, et al. Short-chain fatty acids: microbial metabolites that alleviate stress-induced brain–gut axis alterations. J Physiol. 2018;596(20):4923–44. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP276431.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Quigley E, Murray J, Pimentel M. AGA clinical practice update on small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: expert review. Gastroenterology. 2020;159(4):1526–32. https://doi.org/10.1053/J.GASTRO.2020.06.090.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Singer D, Camargo SMR, Ramadan T, Schäfer M, Mariotta L, Herzog B, et al. Defective intestinal amino acid absorption in Ace2 null mice. Am J Physiol - Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2012;303(6):G686–95. https://doi.org/10.1152/AJPGI.00140.2012.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Hashimoto T, Perlot T, Rehman A, Trichereau J, Ishiguro H, Paolino M, et al. ACE2 links amino acid malnutrition to microbial ecology and intestinal inflammation. Nature. 2012;487(7408):477–81. https://doi.org/10.1038/NATURE11228.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Matsumoto M, Kunisawa A, Hattori T, Kawana S, Kitada Y, Tamada H, et al. Free D-amino acids produced by commensal bacteria in the colonic lumen. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):17915. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36244-z.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Kawase T, Nagasawa M, Ikeda H, Yasuo S, Koga Y, Furuse M. Gut microbiota of mice putatively modifies amino acid metabolism in the host brain. Br J Nutr. 2017;117(6):775–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114517000678.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Mothet J, Parent A, Wolosker H, Brady R, Linden D, Ferris C, et al. D-serine is an endogenous ligand for the glycine site of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(9):4926–31. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.97.9.4926.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Bailey MT, Coe CL. Maternal separation disrupts the integrity of the intestinal microflora in infant rhesus monkeys. Dev Psychobiol. 1999;35:146–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2302(199909)35:2<146::AID-DEV7>3.0.CO;2-G.

  90. Holdeman LV, Good IJ, Moore WEC. Human fecal flora: variation in bacterial composition within individuals and a possible effect of emotional stress. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1976;31(3):359–75. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.31.3.359-375.1976.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Brower DR. Auto-intoxication in its relations to the diseases of the nervous system. J Am Med Assoc. 1898;30(11):575–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1898.72440630001001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Schmidt C. Mental health: thinking from the gut. Nature. 2015;518(7540):S12–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/518S13a.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Bested AC, Logan AC, Selhub EM. Intestinal microbiota, probiotics and mental health: from Metchnikoff to modern advances: part I – autointoxication revisited. Gut Pathog. 2013;5(1):5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-4749-5-5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

This work was supported by KAKENHI Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas “Will dynamics” (JP 16H06404: NS) and Scientific Research (B) (JP 20H04106: NS), as well as by a Grant-in-Aid from the Smoking Research Foundation (NS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

NS wrote all sections of the manuscript and reviewed the final paper. The author read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nobuyuki Sudo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The author (NS) declares no conflicts of interest associated with this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sudo, N. Possible role of the gut microbiota in the pathogenesis of anorexia nervosa. BioPsychoSocial Med 15, 25 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13030-021-00228-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13030-021-00228-9

Keywords

  • Anorexia nervosa
  • Eating disorder
  • Gut microbiota
  • Hyperactivity
  • Uremic toxin