Skip to main content

Advertisement

You are viewing the new article page. Let us know what you think. Return to old version

A behavioral science/behavioral medicine core curriculum proposal for Japanese undergraduate medical education

Abstract

Behavioral science and behavioral medicine have not been systematically taught to Japanese undergraduate medical students. A working group under the auspices of Japanese Society of Behavioral Medicine developed an outcome-oriented curriculum of behavioral science/behavioral medicine through three processes: identifying the curriculum contents, holding a joint symposium with related societies, and defining outcomes and proposing a learning module. The behavioral science/behavioral medicine core curriculum consists of 11 units of lectures and four units of practical study. The working group plans to improve the current core curriculum by devising formative assessment methods so that students can learn and acquire attitude as well as the skills and knowledge necessary for student-centered clinical practice.

Introduction

The Content Specifications for the Japanese National Medical Practitioners Qualifying Examination, the “IX. Treatment” section of Principles of Medicine, and the “II. Psychiatric and Psychosomatic Disorders” section of Medicine include a considerable number of terms related to behavioral medicine. Furthermore, while psychology is taught as a liberal arts subject, it is not necessarily compulsory. Therefore, behavioral medicine has not been directly addressed in Japanese medical education [1]. Meanwhile, behavioral science and social medicine are specified as subjects that must be included and implemented within the educational programs provided by Japanese medical schools and medical universities that are preparing to undergo certified evaluation based on the standards of the World Federation for Medical Education (see Table 1) [2].

Table 1 Annotations of behavioural and social sciences, medical ethics, and medical jurisprudence (in part) provided in the WFME (World Federation for Medical Education) global standards for quality improvement in basic medical education

In Japanese medical education, behavioral science and behavioral medicine are rarely treated as independent curricula and a system for teaching them systematically has not yet been established. Therefore, the Japanese Society of Behavioral Medicine has decided to develop a curriculum for these subjects, which it wishes to recommend for medical education in Japan. In this article, I introduce the background against which the Curriculum was developed, the development process, and the Curriculum itself.

Background

In 2013, the 19th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Society of Behavioral Medicine was held on the theme of “How to utilize behavioral medicine: From education to clinical practice.” The Meeting featured a Presidential lecture by Professor Koji Tsuboi entitled “Behavioral Medicine and Medical Education.” Then, during the preparations for the 20th Annual Meeting, members discussed the importance of and the Society’s contribution to educational issues, and upon the instruction of Professor Shinobu Nomura, the Chairman of the Board of Directors, established a Working Group for the Development of a Core Curriculum for Behavioral Sciences (hereafter referred to as “the Working Group”) under the Japanese Society of Behavioral Medicine Educational and Training Committee (chaired by Professor Mutsuhiro Nakao). Making use of the Japanese Society of Behavioral Medicine’s interdisciplinary characteristics, the Working Group members were selected from the fields of psychology, social medicine, and clinical medicine from among core members who were also actively involved in other related societies.

Since behavioral science and behavioral medicine are interdisciplinary fields, these subjects are not only studied by trainee doctors but by a wide range of trainee health care providers, including nurses, psychologists, and preventative medicine practitioners. Taking into account the needs arising from international certified evaluation, despite focusing on undergraduate medical education, we have decided to expand the curriculum to other occupational categories based on this initial work.

The development process

The Curriculum was developed through the following three processes: (1) the curriculum content was identified, (2) a joint symposium with related societies and a workshop were held, and (3) outcomes were defined and a learning module proposed.

  1. 1.

    Identifying the curriculum content

    The Working Group began compiling a list of knowledge and skills (competencies) related to behavioral science and behavioral medicine that medical students would need to acquire before graduating. Initially, the Working Group gathered information from some members of the Japanese Society of Behavioral Medicine on curriculum development and proposals at their respective institutions. Furthermore, it gathered information on the activities of other universities and related societies, including the Japan Society for Medical Education, surveys conducted by the Education and Training Committee of the International Society of Behavioral Medicine, and trends at universities in the United States [38]. The proposed competencies were moderated, the terminology was edited, and categorical contradictions were removed and a core list was compiled consisting of 52 competencies to be acquired during undergraduate medical education spanning six larger categories (theory and terminology of psychology; theory of behavior modification, treatment and health guidance methods, social psychology/social medicine-related, application of behavior modification, and others).

    Based on this list, we surveyed 111 members of the Japanese Society of Behavioral Medicine using the Delphi method to consolidate the opinions of experts. The first survey was conducted in late October, 2013. Respondents were asked to choose the degree to which each of the 52 competencies should be acquired by students as a minimum requirement before graduating from medical school. There were three options: (1) students do not need to acquire it, (2) students need to know it, and (3) students need to be able to explain or describe it. Based on the results of first round of opinion gathering and the additional competencies proposed by the respondents, the Working Group selected competencies and revised the categories. Then, in early December, 2013, we conducted a second survey of members who agreed to participate during the first survey. Based on the responses to the second survey, we gathered the competencies with a high proportion of (3)s and (2)s and identified the competencies that students need to acquire before graduating from medical school in Japan [9].

  2. 2.

    The joint symposium with related societies and the education workshop

    In March, 2014, the 20th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Society of Behavioral Medicine was held in Kyoto (President: Professor Takeo Nakayama of Kyoto University Graduate School). At the Meeting, the Working Group reported its activities to date, and in order to obtain a wide range of opinions from experts external to the Japanese Society of Behavioral Medicine, held a symposium entitled “Proposing a Core Curriculum for Behavioral Medicine,” to which representatives from the Japan Academy for Health Behavioral Science and the Japanese Association of Behavioral Science were invited. During the symposium, the interim achievements of the Working Group were outlined, and through discussion with representatives and members of related academic societies, the need to develop education that also incorporates Japan’s unique cultural and social circumstances was confirmed, as well as the need for student-centered lectures and practicals. Then, the content of the symposium was summarized in the subsequent Education Workshop held by the Education and Training Committee. Following the 20th Annual Meeting, the Working Group formulated an action plan for the development of a tangible model curriculum based on the competencies identified through the above process.

  3. 3.

    Defining outcomes and proposing a learning module

    While referring to curricula in use at each medical school and graduate school of medicine, we proposed a learning module (a series of model lessons). Although we had initially considered developing a ten-hour “standard” version and a five-hour “minimum” version, we eventually decided to create a standard 1 credit = 15 h learning module and leave the decision about the actual number of study hours to each institution. Specifically, the members of the Working Group split into three groups based on the three divisions of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, psychology, social medicine, and clinical medicine. Then, the psychology and social medicine groups arranged the competencies identified using the Delphi method into units of knowledge and theory to be taught while the clinical medicine group examined methods for acquiring skills and basic approaches for applying this knowledge to clinical cases and treatment. Furthermore, we defined attainment targets for each unit of study. A full debate was held using the findings of the respective groups as springboards for discussion and the learning modules were determined while also taking into account the distribution of content among subject areas. While referring to the open opinions obtained in the member survey, we discussed the outcomes that could be achieved by studying the learning module. In addition, we considered which year of study and what teaching methods would be most effective for helping students to acquire content, which ranged from basic to applied.

Content of the core curriculum for behavioral science/behavioral medicine

We defined the learning outcomes for education in behavioral science and behavioral medicine as shown in Table 2 and developed a core curriculum and learning module to help students achieve these outcomes before graduating from medical school (see Table 3). The Core Curriculum is based on one koma (90 min lesson) per unit of study, and in addition to 11 units of lectures, we have included four units of practical study, for which we recommend teaching methods such as tutorial materials and the case method. The decision to include these practical units was prompted by the need for students to develop the skills and basic approaches for considering how to apply the knowledge acquired in lectures to clinical cases and treatments.

Table 2 Outcome of the core curriculum for behavioral science/medicine in Japanese undergraduate medical education
Table 3 Learning module for the core curriculum in behavioral science/medicine in undergraduate education

We chose to leave decisions regarding the integration of units and the adjustment of the number of koma to the respective institutions. For example, it is possible to select lecture content based on the characteristics of the course, for example when using the curriculum for the psychology division of liberal arts courses. In addition, in terms of methods of taking classes, it is possible to teach the basic theory in the lower years of study and have students learn about, for example, the application of behavior modification theory during the upper years of study as part of the Clinical Clerkship or Social Medicine Clerkship courses.

Future directions: toward the expansion of the curriculum for behavioral medicine

The curricula of medical education are also renewed over time in accordance with changes in social conditions, including advances in medical technology. In the United States, Social and Behavioral Science is a compulsory subject in the unified curriculum that was recently introduced at graduate schools of public health, and graduate schools have begun reorganizing their curricula accordingly. This Core Curriculum was developed by organizing the minimum competencies that Japanese medical students are expected to acquire before graduating from medical school based on the opinions of experts from the Japanese Society of Behavioral Medicine. However, the competencies required of medical students will also change in accordance with the demands of society. The curriculum includes content related to cultural phenomena, a relatively new issue that has received considerable attention recently. Although this content was not included as an independent unit, it is expected that the importance of cultural competence will continue to increase [10]. Therefore, we hope to continue this discussion when revising the curriculum in the future.

We are continuing to discuss the scope of behavioral science and behavioral medicine. Although topics concerning basic interaction between doctors and patients, such as adherence, and the application of behavioral science techniques, such as behavior modification, can be defined as preventative intervention, they are also closely related to clinical practice. In North America, behavioral medicine has been incorporated into general education topics [11] and a significant number of specialist clinical competencies are included in the content specifications for the Behavioral Science section of the United States Medical Licensing Examination [12]. Meanwhile, at the biannual International Congress of Behavioral Medicine meeting, the scope of basic biobehavioral research has expanded rapidly [13]. Recognizing that the overlap between behavioral science and behavioral medicine is, at present, difficult to remove, the Working Group decided to integrate the two fields of study.

In contemporary medical education, students are required to go beyond simply “knowing” by developing their ability to “apply” knowledge. Therefore, problem-based learning (PBL) [14] and team-based learning (TBL) [15], in which students work together in small groups to solve problems concerning hypothetical clinical cases, have been recommended as effective approaches. To help students achieve the outcomes specified in the Curriculum, we recommend the use of practicals and seminars that include activities such as role-plays, for developing holistic understanding of disorders, and practical skills for behavior modification, as well as PBL and TBL methods, which encourage students to consider actual treatment strategies in clinical case scenarios. The Working Group recognizes the importance of developing model case scenarios and commentaries in achieving this goal and has proposed a series of case scenario materials that can be used in the PBL classroom (see Table 4).

Table 4 Medical case scenarios for problem-based learning (PBL)

In the future, it will be necessary to devise and establish new assessment methods in response to the forthcoming expansion of student-centered clinical practice. For example, it is thought that, in addition to skills-based training, students can strengthen their communication skills by receiving feedback on their approaches and attitudes, not only through role-plays but also by interacting with a large number of patients in authentic clinical settings. In addition to summative assessment, it is important to enhance formative assessment methods.

Conclusions

I hope that medical educators will find this report to be a useful material that forms a basis for developing a comprehensive curriculum in behavioral medicine in Japanese undergraduate medical education. As behavioral medicine and psychosomatic medicine share lots of common elements not only for teaching medical students but also for caring for patients, I believe this report is beneficial to the readers in the field of psychosomatic medicine.

References

  1. 1.

    Inoue S. Globalization of medical education and behavioral medicine: background of the development of core curriculum for behavioural medicine in Japanese medical education by the Japanese Society of Behavioral Medicine. Jpn J Behav Med. 2014;20(2):47–51.

  2. 2.

    WFME. WFME global standards for quality improvement in basic medical education: Japanese version. http://jsme.umin.ac.jp/ann/WFME-GS-JAPAN.pdf. Accessed 19 Jul 2015.

  3. 3.

    Japan Society for Medical Education. Igaku kyoiku hakusho 2010 nenban (2007 – 2010) [2010 medical education report (2007–2010)]. Tokyo: Shinohara Shuppan; 2010.

  4. 4.

    Japan Society for Medical Education Behavioral Science and Human Relations Education Committee. Kodo-kagaku kyoiku o kangaeru: purofesshonaru kyoiku o mezashite [Considering behavioral science education: Toward professional education]. http://jsme.umin.ac.jp/books/KODO-IINKAI-1.pdf. Accessed 19 Jul 2015.

  5. 5.

    Glanz K, Owen N, Wold JA. Perspectives on behavioral sciences research for disease prevention and control in populations. J Natl Inst Public Health. 2009; 58(1). http://www.niph.go.jp/journal/data/58-1/j58-1.html. Accessed 19 July 2015.

  6. 6.

    Doi Y, Uehata T, Hata E, Minowa M, Mochizuki Y, Kawachi I. Kokuritsu hoken-iryo-kagakuin ni okeru kodo-kagaku kyoiku no torikumi [Initiatives for behavioral science education at the National Institute of Public Health]. Jpn J Public Health. 2002;49(9):897–901.

  7. 7.

    International Society of Behavioral Medicine. Education and training-related activities in the 12th ICBM, August 29th - September 1st 2012. Budapest, Hungary. http://www.isbm.info/education/html/activities.html.

  8. 8.

    Liaison Committee for Revision of the Model Core Curriculum, Research Committee for Revision of the Model Core Curriculum. Proposed model core Curriculum for medical students: Guidelines for the core content of the medical education program in Japan, revised edition; 2010.

  9. 9.

    Japanese Society of Behavioral Medicine Working Group for the Development of a Core Curriculum for Behavioral Sciences. Required competency on behavioral science for undergraduate medical education: a survey using the Delphi method. Jpn J Behav Med. 2014;20(2):63–8.

  10. 10.

    Committee on Educating Public Health Professionals for the 21st Century. Who will keep the public healthy? Washington, DC: National Academies Press, Institute of Medicine; 2002.

  11. 11.

    Fujisaki K. Nihon no kodo-kagaku no kyoiku karikyuramu no genjo [The current state of curricula for behavioral science in Japan]. Jpn J Behav Med. 2003;10(1):2–6.

  12. 12.

    Fadem B. BRS Behavioral Science (Board Review Series). 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.

  13. 13.

    ICBM 2016. (http://www.icbm2016.com/ accessed 8 September 2015)

  14. 14.

    Nweble D, Cannon R. A handbook for medical teachers. 3rd ed. Dordrecht, Boston: Kluwer; 1994.

  15. 15.

    Miki Y, Seo H. Topics in medical education - innovation in medical education: Team-Based Learning (TBL). J Nippon Med Sch. 2011;7(1):20–3.

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to express our sincere gratitude to Drs. Yuriko Doi and Kumiko Yamazaki for providing valuable information in the process of developing this Curriculum and to the members of the Japanese Society of Behavioral Medicine for cooperating in our Delphi survey.

Japanese Society of Behavioral Medicine Working Group for the Development of a Core Curriculum for Behavioral Medicine (* indicates the Chairperson): Marie Amitani (Department of Community-Based Medicine, Education Center for Doctors in Remote Islands and Rural Areas, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University); Yoshiki Ishikawa (Innovation Department, Cancer Scan Co., Ltd); Akio Inui (Department of Psychosomatic Internal Medicine, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University); Shigeru Inoue (Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Tokyo Medical University); Akihito Shimazu (Department of Mental Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo); Shigeki Suwa (Division of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Nursing, Tokyo Women’s Medical University); Koji Tsuboi (Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Toho University School of Medicine); Akira Tsuda (Department of Psychology, Faculty of Literature, Kurume University); Akizumi Tsutsumi* (Department of Public Health, Kitasato University School of Medicine); Mutsuhiro Nakao (Graduate School of Public Health, Teikyo University & Division of Psychosomatic Medicine, Teikyo University Hospital); Takeo Nakayama (Department of Health Informatics, Division of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University); Masahiro Hashizume (Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Toho University School of Medicine); Kazuhiro Yoshiuchi (Department of Stress Sciences and Psychosomatic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo).

Author information

Correspondence to Akizumi Tsutsumi.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contribution

AT drafted and completed the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Keywords

  • Behavioral Medicine
  • Behavioral Science
  • Psychosomatic Medicine
  • Learning Module
  • Core Curriculum