Skip to content

Advertisement

BioPsychoSocial Medicine

Open Access

Somatic manifestation of distress: clinical medicine, psychological, and public health perspectives

BioPsychoSocial MedicineThe official journal of the Japanese Society of Psychosomatic Medicine201711:33

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13030-017-0119-3

Received: 13 October 2017

Accepted: 8 November 2017

Published: 18 December 2017

Somatic complaints are often related to chronic stress-related illnesses, but the diagnoses are not obvious in all cases. In some cases, patients could be classified with functional somatic syndromes. These syndromes are defined as several related disease-conditions that are characterized more by symptoms, suffering, and disability than by structural or functional abnormalities [1]. Functional somatic syndromes typically include irritable bowel syndrome, tension type headache, chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, and some types of menstruation-related problems, all of which are frequently observed in psychosomatic medicine clinics. In addition, somatic complaints that are not fully explained by a medical condition could be diagnosed as somatic symptom disorders from a psychiatric perspective. According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, the symptoms must cause clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other areas of functioning [2].

In this thematic series of “somatic manifestation of distress: functional somatic syndromes and somatic symptom disorders”, a total of five articles [37] have been published to show somatic manifestations of distress from clinical medicine, psychological, and public health perspectives (Table 1). First, concepts such as somatization, somatosensory amplification, and somatosensory catastrophizing are introduced to explain somatic manifestations of distress [3]. Somatosensory amplification occurs when these bodily sensations become stronger and more painful. Somatosensory catastrophizing is the tendency to attribute these bodily sensations to unbearable functional modulation or as signs of serious illness. In this study, the close relationship between somatosensory amplification, somatosensory catastrophizing, and physical symptoms was clarified, and it was shown that somatizing patients exhibited significantly more somatosensory amplification and somatosensory catastrophizing, compared with those in the non-patient group.
Table 1

Outline of thematic series of "somatic manifestation of distress: functional somatic syndromes and somatic symptom disorders"

Clinical assessment:

 Theoretical model of somatosensory amplification and somatosensory catastrophizing thinking [3]

 Clinical epidemiology of functional somatic syndromes in psychosomatic medicine clinic [4]

Psychological intervention:

 Autogenic training in functional somatic syndromes [5]

 Brief internet-based cognitive behavior therapy for self-care [6]

Public health issue:

 Physical change related to menstrual cycle in working women [7]

The clinical characteristics of somatizing patients have been summarized in the setting of a psychosomatic clinic at a Japanese university hospital [4]. Among approximately 600 new patients who had somatic symptoms at the psychosomatic clinic, 11% met the definition of functional somatic symptoms, and 74% had somatization associated with a mood or anxiety disorder. In that study, it was important to find statistically significant and positive tendencies between somatization and referral by a primary care physician because it suggests that consultation with a primary care physician may facilitate appropriate care at a psychosomatic clinic [8, 9].

Autogenic training, a treatment technique used to elicit a relaxation response, was performed in 24 patients with functional somatic syndromes who visited the outpatient clinic or were hospitalized at the department of psychosomatic medicine at a Japanese university hospital [5]. The autogenic training program consisted of three teaching sessions at intervals of 2 months and self-exercises for 3 min, twice a day. The program eased dysregulation of the autonomic nervous system, which was measured by the salivary amylase stress marker. In addition, the program contributed to decreasing tension-anxiety and somatic symptoms in patients with functional somatic syndromes. According to previous results of a meta-analysis on autogenic training [10], positive treatment effects have been identified for a variety of disease conditions, such as tension headache/migraine, mild-to-moderate essential hypertension, coronary heart disease, bronchial asthma, somatoform pain disorder (unspecified type), Raynaud’s disease, and functional sleep problems. Thus, the relaxation response techniques, including autogenic training, are expected to be effective in treating functional somatic syndromes.

As a promising psychological intervention of somatization, internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy has been reported to have a treatment effect on somatic symptoms in association with improvements in anxiety and other psychological conditions [6]. Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy is a technology-based technique delivered with or without the support of a clinician, and a previous meta-analysis indicated that computer-based psychological treatments are effective for depression and anxiety disorders [11]. Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy may contribute to increased savings in indirect healthcare costs, due to the greater number of self-supporting functional patients with somatic syndrome [12].

Physical changes related to the menstrual cycle have been associated with excessive working hours in approximately 1600 female alumnae who graduated from a famous women’s university [7]. That study showed that a short time interval increases both anxiety and dissatisfaction with health in working women. According to a previous study that predicted functional somatic syndromes [13], female sex and a high level of intelligence as well as high numbers of functional somatic symptoms are significantly associated with the diagnosis of functional somatic syndrome. An unhealthy lifestyle is closely related to functional somatic symptoms or suboptimal health status [14], and increased efforts to modify unhealthy lifestyles, which include longer work times with shorter interval times, are necessary to prevent such disease conditions.

These five articles [37] will facilitate researchers’ study of biopsychosocial aspects of psychosomatic illnesses, functional somatic syndromes, and any stress-related health condition.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

"Not applicable"..

Funding

“No funding for this article”.

Availability of data and materials

“Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed.”

Author’s contributions

The author wrote the manuscript and holds final responsibility for the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

“Not applicable”.

Consent for publication

“Not applicable”.

Competing interests

The author declares that there are no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Teikyo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
(2)
Division of Psychosomatic Medicine, Teikyo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

References

  1. Barsky AJ, Borus JF. Functional somatic syndromes. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:910–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Wollburg E, Voigt K, Braukhaus C, Herzog A, Löwe B. Construct validity and descriptive validity of somatoform disorders in light of proposed changes for the DSM-5. J Psychosom Res. 2013;74:18–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Seto H, Nakao M. Relationships between catastrophic thought, bodily sensations and physical symptoms. Biopsychosoc Med. 2017; in pressGoogle Scholar
  4. Nakamura Y, Takeuchi T, Hashimoto K, Hashizume M. Clinical features of outpatients with somatization symptoms treated at a Japanese psychosomatic medicine clinic. Biopsychosoc Med. 2017;11:16.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Kiba T, Abe T, Kanbara K, Kato F, Kawashima S, Saka Y, Yamamoto K, Mizuno Y, Nishiyama J, Fukunaga M. The relationship between salivary amylase and the physical and psychological changes elicited by continuation of autogenic training in patients with functional somatic syndrome. Biopsychosoc Med. 2017;11:17.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Shirotsuki K, Nonaka Y, Takano J, Abe K, Adachi SI, Adachi S, Nakao M. Brief internet-based cognitive behavior therapy program with a supplement drink improved anxiety and somatic symptoms in Japanese workers. BioPsychoSoc Med. 2017;11:25.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Nishikitani M, Nakao M, Tsurugano S, Inoue M, Yano E. Relationship between menstruation status and work conditions in Japan. BioPsychoSoc Med. 2017;11:26.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Novák M, Gazdag G, Túry F. Psychosomatic medicine and consultation–liaison psychiatry in Hungary. J Psychosom Res. 2009;66:187–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Nakao M, Takeuchi T. Clinical characteristics and referral patterns of outpatients visiting a Japanese psychosomatic medicine clinic. Int J Behav Med. 2015;20:1–9.Google Scholar
  10. Stetter F, Kupper S. Autogenic training: a meta-analysis of clinical outcome studies. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2002;27:45–98.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Haug T, Nordgreen T, Goran L, Ost LG, Havik OE. Self-help treatment of anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis and meta-regression of effects and potential moderators. Clin Psychol Rev. 2012;32:425–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Schröder A, Ørnbøl E, Jensen JS, Sharpe M, Fink P. Long-term economic evaluation of cognitive-behavioural group treatment versus enhanced usual care for functional somatic syndromes. J Psychosom Res. 2017;94:73–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kingma EM, De Jonge P, Ormel J, Rosmalen JG. Predictors of a functional somatic syndrome diagnosis in patients with persistent functional somatic symptoms. Int J Behav Med. 2013;20:206–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen J, Xiang H, Jiang P, Yu L, Jing Y, Li F, Wu S, Fu X, Liu Y, Kwan H, Luo R, Zhao X, Sun X. The role of healthy lifestyle in the implementation of regressing suboptimal health status among college students in China: a nested case-control study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Feb;28:14(3).Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement