Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics, CATS, EPQ-R, and LES scores, and their correlation with SUBI subjective well-being scores or effects on SUBI subjective well-being scores in 404 adult volunteers

From: Neuroticism mediates the association between childhood abuse and the well-being of community dwelling adult volunteers

Characteristic or Measure

Value (number or mean ± SD)

Correlation with SUBI subjective well-being scores (r) or effect on them (mean ± SD of subjective well-being scores, t-test)

Age

 

42.3 ± 11.9

r = – 0.16**

Sex (male: female)

 

220: 184

Male 39.4 ± 6.6 vs female 38.8 ± 6.2, n.s. (t-test)

Education, years

 

15.2 ± 2.0

r = 0.16**

Employment status (employed: unemployed)

341: 56

Employed 39.0 ± 6.3 vs unemployed 39.6 ± 7.4, n.s. (t-test)

Marital status (married: unmarried)

287: 114

Married 39.3 ± 6.3 vs unmarried 38.4 ± 6.4, n.s. (t-test)

Number of cohabiters

1.8 ± 1.5

r = 0.010, n.s

Number of offspring

1.3 ± 1.2

r = 0.004, n.s

Comorbidity of physical disease (yes: no)

81: 319

Yes 38.2 ± 6.3 vs no 39.4 ± 6.4, n.s. (t-test)

1st-degree relative with psychiatric diseases (yes: no)

40: 362

Yes 37.7 ± 7.1 vs no 39.3 ± 6.3, n.s. (t-test)

Subjective social status score

4.9 ± 1.5

r = –0.21**

EPQ-R neuroticism score

3.6 ± 3.2

r = –0.37**

SUBI subjective well-being score

39.1 ± 6.4

 

CATS total average score

0.65 ± 0.43

r = –0.23**

LES (change score)

Negative

1.65 ± 3.09

r = –0.17**

Positive

1.67 ± 2.95

r = 0.15**

  1. Notes: Data are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD) or numbers
  2. Abbreviations: CATS Child Abuse and Trauma Scale, EPQ-R Eysenck Personality Questionnaire revised, LES Life Experiences Survey, SUBI Subjective Well-Being Inventory
  3. n.s. not significant
  4. r = Pearson correlation coefficient
  5. **P < 0.01Â