Validation of the brief Adjustment Disorder New Modules with Australian oncology patients

Table 8 Summary of fit indices for the six models maximum likelihood—standardised regression weights (N = 405)

Fit index	Criteria	Kazlauskas Models		Ben-Ezra Models
		ADNM-8				ADNM-4
		Model 1	Model 2	Model 3	Model 4	Model 5	Model 6
χ2		122.210	69.055	92.453	121.803	0.397	6.253
p		< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	0.529	0.044
df		19	18	13	14	1	2
χ2 /df	≤ 2.00	6.43	3.836389	7.111769	8.700214	0.397	3.1265
NFI	≥ .95	0.932	0.962	0.941	0.922	0.999	0.990
TLI	≥ .95	0.914	0.955	0.917	0.895	1.006	0.978
CFI	≥ .95	0.942	0.971	0.948	0.930	1.000	0.993
RMSEA	< .05	0.116	0.084	0.123	0.138	0.000	0.072
RMSEA	90% CI	0.097–0.136	0.063–0.105	0.100–0.147	0.116–0.161	0.000–0.112	0.010–0.140
SRMR	< .08	0.037	0.032	0.033	0.041	0.004	0.016
AIC		6988.509	6937.355	6047.702	6075.053	3743.130	3746.985
BIC		7009.278	6958.955	6065.979	6092.499	3753.930	3756.954

Note. Df degrees of freedom, NFI Normed fit Index, TLI Tucker Lewis Index, CFI Comparative Fit Index, RMSEA Root Mean Square Error of Approximation, 90% CI RMSEA 90% Confidence Interval, SRMR Standardised Root Mean Square Residual, AIC Akaike Information Criterion, BIC Bayesian Information Criterion

ISSN: 1751-0759