Skip to main content

Table 4 Evaluation of the training curriculum after the first project year (the experimental phase; n= 47 future teachers and/or participants)

From: Results of a psychosomatic training program in China, Vietnam and Laos: successful cross-cultural transfer of a postgraduate training program for medical doctors

 

Total mean (SD)

The psychosocial knowledge has relevance (0 being no relevance and 100 being high relevance)

 

- for my daily work

66.8 (19.79)

- for my personal life

73.0 (17.80)

The skill training provided by the training courses has relevance (0 being no relevance and 100 being high relevance)

 

- for my daily work

79.4 (13.43)

- for my personal life

71.3 (17.53)

The Balint groups in which I participated and the self-experience that I acquired had relevance (0 being no relevance and 100 being high relevance)

 

- for my daily work

78.1 (14.54)

- for my personal life

69.3 (22.05)

Are you satisfied with your performance during the course? (from 0 being not at all to 100 being quite good)

77.8 (12.81)

Please rate the organization of the training program (from 0 being poor to 100 being quite good)

80.0 (14.60)

Please rate the didactic presentation of the training program (from 0 being poor to 100 being quite good)

81.9 (14.02)

Did the modules of the training program fit your personal needs? (from 0 indicating that the modules were too redundant or complicated to 100 indicating that my personal needs were met)

79.1 (14.12)

How important for you were the following items? (1= not important, 2= important, and 3= very important)

 

- skills training

2.8 (0.40)

- theoretical knowledge

2.3 (0.59)

- self-experience

2.5 (0.59)