Skip to main content

Table 4 Sleep and presenteeism outcomes for each study included in the systematic review

From: A systematic review of the effect of sleep interventions on presenteeism

Study

Intervention

Sleep outcomes

Presenteeism outcomes

Statistical significance (Presenteeism)

Risk of bias (Cochrane Collaboration’s tool)

Risk of bias (ROBINS-I)

Bostock et al. (2016) [16]

CBT-I (Digital cognitive behavioral therapy: Sleepio)

Intervention vs. control

SCI

WPAI

F (1, 485) = 10.99, p < 0.001, d = 0.67

Low risk of bias: 4/7

High risk of bias: 0/7

Unclear risk of bias: 3/7

N/A

Espie et al. (2018) [11]

CBT-I (Digital cognitive behavioral therapy: Sleepio)

Pre vs. post

SCI

WPAI

t (87) = 4.83, p < 0.01

N/A

Critical

Behrendt et al. (2020) [29]

Internet-delivered CBT-I

Intervention vs. control

ISI

Self-report of the number of days in the past 3 months that work efficiency has decreased due to ill health

Posttreatment

N/A

6-months follow-up

mean difference between groups = −6.455, p < 0.001, d = 0.83

Low risk of bias: 3/7

High risk of bias: 3/7

Unclear risk of bias: 1/7

N/A

Burton et al. (2016) [17]

Sleep hygiene education

Pre vs. post

Mayo Clinic tool

WLQ

Time-management demands

Physical demands

Mental-interpersonal demands

Output demands

Overall

No description of the coefficient of the chi-square test

Time-management demands

p < 0.001

Physical demands

n.s.

Mental-interpersonal demands

p < 0.001

Output demands

p < 0.001

Overall

p < 0.001

N/A

Critical

Wolever et al. (2012) [30]

Yoga

Mindfulness

Intervention vs. control

PSQI

WLQ (overall)

F (2, 233) = 2.07, n.s., η2 = 0.02

Low risk of bias: 2/7

High risk of bias: 0/7

Unclear risk of bias: 5/7

N/A

Morgan et al. (2012) [31]

The workplace power program

Intervention vs. control

ESS

WLQ

Time-management demands

Physical demands

Mental-interpersonal demands

Output demands

Overall

Time-management demands

mean difference between groups is 7.7, p = 0.20, d = 0.37

Physical demands

mean difference between groups is 9.8, p = 0.04, d = 0.41

Mental-interpersonal demands

mean difference between groups is 5.0, p = 0.11, d = 0.35

Output demands

mean difference between groups is 6.1, p = 0.23, d = 0.29

Overall

mean difference between groups is 2.0, p = 0.01, d = 0.56

Low risk of bias: 4/7

High risk of bias: 1/7

Unclear risk of bias: 2/7

N/A

Mills et al. (2007) [32]

Changing the color temperature of fluorescent lights in the workplace (17,000 K vs. 2900 K)

Intervention vs. control

Pre vs. post

Item 9 of Columbia Jet Lag Scale (sleepiness during the day)

WHO-HPQ

Overall

t (67) = −2.72, n.s.

Intervention change

t (45) = − 6.07, p < 0.001

Control change

t (22) = − 1.16, n.s.

N/A

Serious

  1. ROBINS-I Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions, CBT-I Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, SCI Sleep Condition Indicator, WPAI Work Productivity and Impairment questionnaire, N/A Not applicable, ISI Insomnia Severity Index, WLQ Work Limitation Questionnaire, n.s. not significant, PSQI Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, ESS Epworth Sleepiness Scale, WHO-HPQ World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire