Skip to main content

Table 1 Family member characteristics and outcome measures

From: Factors influencing post-ICU psychological distress in family members of critically ill patients: a linear mixed-effects model

Family members characteristics

n = 214

Missing values

Agea mean ± SD

53.95 ± 15.67

5

Female gendera n(%)

148 (69.2)

–

Civil status n(%)

 

1

 married, partnered

154 (72.3)

 

 divorced, separated

12 (5.6)

 

 single

35 (16.4)

 

 widowed

12 (5.6)

 

Own children, yes n(%)

150 (71.1)

3

Educationa n(%)

 

2

 Non-tertiary

109 (51.4)

 

 Tertiary or university

103 (48.6)

 

Employment n(%)

 

1

 employed

115 (54.0)

 

 retired

65 (30.5)

 

 unemployed

10 (4.7)

 

 other

23 (10.8)

 

Distance home-to-hospitala n(%)

 

–

 Same canton / region

109 (50.9)

 

 Outside canton / region

105 (49.1)

 

Relation of family member to patienta n(%)

 

–

 spouse / partner

97 (45.3)

 

 child

57 (26.6)

 

 parent

28 (13.1)

 

 other family member

32 (15.0)

 

Co-habiting with patient before admissiona n(%)

119 (55.6)

–

Time since ICU discharge > 4 weeksa n(%)

107 (50.0)

–

Satisfaction with ICU carea (FS-ICU-24b) mean ± SD

73.54 ± 16.26

5

Family members outcomes

n = 214

Missing values

Psychological burden (HADS-totalc) mean ± SD

11.49 ± 8.12

5

Depression (HADS-depressionc) mean ± SD

4.69 ± 4.39

5

Anxiety (HADS-anxietyc) mean ± SD

6.81 ± 4.42

3

Posttraumatic stress (IES-R-6d) mean ± SD

11.90 ± 4.90

2

  1. aincluded in the model as an explanatory variable
  2. bFS-ICU-24 score ranges from 0 to 100 (maximal satisfaction)
  3. cHADS-total score ranges from 0 to 42 (high psychological burden), HADS-depression and HADS anxiety from 0 to 21 (high depressive symptoms / anxiety)
  4. dIES-R-6 score from 0 to 24 (posttraumatic stress)