Table 2 Result of hierarchical multiple regression to explain PCS and MCS by sex of the family caregiver
PCS: male | β | PCS: female | β | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
step 1 | step 2 | step 1 | step 2 | ||
age | -.13 | -.13 | age | -.33*** | -.33*** |
job status | .02 | .02 | job status | -.03 | -.03 |
support size | .09 | support size | -.02 | ||
social support | .22* | social support | -.03 | ||
R 2 | .02 | .09 | R 2 | .09*** | .08** |
R2 change | .07* | R2 change | .00 | ||
MCS: male | β | MCS: female | β | ||
step 1 | step 2 | step 1 | step 2 | ||
age | -.07 | -.06 | age | .18* | .16 |
job status | -.02 | -.02 | job status | .20* | .19* |
support size | .14 | support size | .19* | ||
social support | .25* | social support | .02 | ||
R 2 | -.02 | .07* | R 2 | .04* | .06* |
R2 change | .11** | R2 change | .04 | ||