Skip to main content

Table 3 Coping in men with prostate cancer

From: Psychological adjustment of men with prostate cancer: a review of the literature

Study

Design

Characteristics of the sample

Major Findings

Bjork et al. (1999)

• Cross-sectional study – mail-out survey using the Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale, The Life Orientation Test, Beck Depression Inventory and the Stait-Trait Anxiety Inventory

• 30 usable responses (mean 62 years since diagnosis) from 55 questionnaires distributed

• Completed a range of distress-related and self-esteem measures

• Helplessness related to lower self-esteem; Loss appraisals to depression; threat appraisals to anxiety; optimism negatively related to depression and anxiety

Helgeson and Lepore (1997)

• Cross-sectional study – mail-out using the CARES and several measures developed for the study

• 162 usable responses from 258 questionnaires distributed Most (83%) were radical prostatectomies, a mean of 13 months since diagnosis

• Self-focused identity associated with worse functioning, greater cancer difficulties and poorer emotional expression

• Expressed emotion mediated the links between self-identity and cancer difficulties

Lepore and Helgeson (1998)

• Cross-sectional study – mail-out using MHI-5, Impact of Events Scale, and CARES

• 181 usable responses from 258 questionnaires distributed Most (83%) were radical prostatectomies, a mean of 13 months since diagnosis

• Social constraints in talking about cancer moderated trauma and mental health relationships

• Conclusion: Supportive social networks may promote psychological adjustment by facilitating cognitive processing of the cancer experience

Penedo et al. (2003)

• Cross-sectional study using the Life Orientation Test-Revised and Measure of Current Status

• 46 radical prostatectomy patients recruited to a stress management study

• Optimism, perceived stress management skills, and positive mood were correlated

• Relationship between optimism and positive mood might be mediated by perceived stress management skills.

Zakowski et al. (2003)

• Cross-sectional study comparing men and women with cancer using the Social Constraints Scale, The Emotional Expressivity Scale, the Impact of Events Scale and the Profile of Mood States

• 41 men with PCA and 41 women with gynaecological cancer

• Men experienced greater distress in association with social constraints from their partners than did the women

• Men might have fewer outlets for emotional expression so constraints from partners might lead to greater distress.