Open Access

Psychosomatic complaints and sense of coherence among adolescents in a county in Sweden: a cross-sectional school survey

  • Bo Simonsson1, 3Email author,
  • Kent W Nilsson2,
  • Jerzy Leppert2 and
  • Vinod K Diwan3
BioPsychoSocial MedicineThe official journal of the Japanese Society of Psychosomatic Medicine20082:4

DOI: 10.1186/1751-0759-2-4

Received: 02 November 2007

Accepted: 08 February 2008

Published: 08 February 2008

The Erratum to this article has been published in BioPsychoSocial Medicine 2015 9:22

Abstract

Background

Over the last five to ten years there has been an increase in psychosomatic complaints (PSC) in Swedish children. The objective of the study was to examine the relation between PSC and sense of coherence (SOC).

Methods

A cross-sectional school survey in the county of Västmanland, Sweden. All 16- and 19-year old adolescents present at school on the day of the survey were asked to complete a questionnaire in their classrooms during a one-lesson hour session under the supervision of their teachers. Totally 3,998 students in both private and public schools, studying in ninth grade elementary school or third grade secondary school participated.

Results

The results from our study show that there is a statistically significant relation between PSC and SOC among adolescents. It also shows that adolescents with a weak SOC score have more symptoms of PSC.

Conclusion

Our study indicates that SOC can help the adolescents to choose a coping strategy that is appropriate for the situation and thereby may prevent them from developing PSC. However, additional studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Introduction

The major causes of mortality and morbidity among adolescents have, during the last decades, shifted from infectious to behavioural aetiologies [1]. This shift is mostly due to risk taking behaviours among adolescents that lead to, among others, injuries and drug and alcohol misuse [2]. Mental health problems are also common among young people. The mental health problems can range from fully developed psychiatric diseases to learning disabilities, behavioural problems in school, speech- and language problems and psychosomatic complaints (PSC) [3]. To better understand the development of psychosomatic complaints among adolescents, it was decided to perform a population-based study, which is to our knowledge, the first to examine the relation between PSC and sense of coherence (SOC) among adolescents.

Psychosomatic complaints

The symptoms of psychosomatic disorders usually begin during adolescence or early adulthood and are characterised by many vague physical complaints. Any part of the body may be affected, although the symptoms and their frequencies vary. Common symptoms among adolescents are headaches, nausea and vomiting, abdominal pain, diarrhoea or constipation, fatigue, fainting, dizziness, sleeping problems, and nervousness. The most frequently seen symptoms among adolescents should be differentiated from psychosomatic disorders seen among adults [4].

During the last decade, studies in several countries have shown that the proportion of adolescents with psychosomatic complaints (PSC) increased [59]. At present, it is estimated that between 5–10% of adolescents have so severe problems that they affect their daily lives. There are several social and structural factors that contribute to the perceived health among adolescents. One is the family structure. Among adolescents who live with single parents, PSC is twice as common, compared to adolescents living in nuclear families.

The Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC) study, conducted by the World Health Organisation in 35 countries in 2002, indicates that adolescents from less privileged socio-economic groups report more physical and psychological symptoms than those from more privileged backgrounds [10]. In an interesting study, the physical symptoms and the psychological complaints in Japanese and Swedish schoolchildren was compared [11]. There was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of both physical symptoms and psychological complaints suggesting, that there might also be a cultural dimension to the development of PSC.

Current research suggests that psychological coping resources may serve as a buffer against the effects of negative stress on health. Antonovsky has developed a salutogenic model, the sense of coherence that indicates that successful coping with daily stressors is decisive for maintaining good health [12].

Sense of coherence

According to Antonovsky, sense of coherence (SOC) is a way in which persons control their environment in order to make meaningful action [13]. SOC is a way of seeing the world, which facilitates successful coping with the innumerable, complex stressors that confront individuals in their daily lives. Furthermore, Antonovsky postulates that, "SOC is very explicitly not a substantive coping strategy, as mastery orientation or an internal locus of control". Individuals with a strong SOC perceive the world as predictable, manageable and meaningful and view environmental stressors as challenges worth facing. Such a person is very flexible, which enables him/her to find successful solutions to conflicts. A person with a strong SOC is less likely to perceive many stressful situations as threatening and anxiety provoking than one with a weak SOC. This way of conceptualising SOC can have certain implications when it comes to adolescents and psychosomatic symptoms [14].

This study is based on the results from an ongoing longitudinal survey known as "Survey of Adolescent Life in Vestmanland" (SALVe). The survey was started in 1995 to describe the health situation and secular trends in health, lifestyle and habits in the whole county of Västmanland in Sweden, a county situated in the middle of Sweden with 260,000 inhabitants. Included in the longitudinal survey are all students, in both public and private schools, attending 6th and 9th grade elementary school and 3rd grade upper secondary school. Children in institutions or attending special schools for intellectually handicapped were excluded. The survey is unique in that it has surveyed a large number of students. So far 13,362 individual students have been included in the survey. Results from the longitudinal survey have been reported in several scientific articles [1519]. Five cross-sectional studies have so far been conducted, in 1995, 1998, 2001, 2004 and 2006. These studies have shown that there is an increase in the proportion of adolescents who experience psychosomatic symptoms.

This study had the following objective: to test the hypotheses that: (i) individuals with weaker SOC will have more PSC; and, (ii) individuals with stronger SOC will have less PSC. Furthermore, our aim was also to test if our SOC-PSC-model controls for the psychosocial risk factors used in our study.

Methods

Study design and participants

For this study we used data from the cross-sectional study performed 1998. The questionnaires were distributed to all public and private schools in Västmanland. The students voluntarily and anonymously answered the questionnaire items during a 40–60 minute lesson-hour.

The inclusion criteria were that the participants should either attend 9th grade in primary school or 3rd grade secondary school in the County of Västmanland. The total eligible population was 5,125. Of these 4,305 completed the questionnaire. After adjusting for internal dropout, the total student population that participated in this study was 3,998 students, or 78.0% of the eligible students. Of the 820 students who did not complete the questionnaire, 463 students in 9th grade classes had planned practical working life orientation and were not at school the day the questionnaire was administered. Others, 98 students, were absent due to illness, 98 students, and the remaining 259 for other unknown reasons.

Survey questionnaire

The questionnaire in the health study included several items from which the following were selected for this study: age, gender, social background factors, psychosomatic complaints and Antonovsky's short, 13-items version [Additional file 1].

The psychosocial background factors were ethnicity, residential type, family constellation and parental employment. The factors were coded as follows:

Ethnicity: (1) the adolescent was born in Sweden, (2) born abroad.

Residential type: (1) single family housing, (2) living in a block of flats.

Family constellation: (1) biological parents living together (2) separated parents.

Parental employment: (1) both parents working, (2) at least one non-working parent.

There were six physical symptoms measuring the psychosomatic complaints; i.e., headache, stomachache, feeling irritated, nervousness, sleeping problems and dizziness. These symptoms were all measured in four categories: often, sometimes, seldom and never. Each item was reversed for the index-calculation (high score = severe symptoms). A factor analysis was performed that gave a one-dimensional factor structure with an eigenvalue of 2.792. The six components explained 47% of the variance in the material. The factor loading for each component was for; stomach-ache .726, headache .695, dizziness .688, feeling irritated .684, nervousness .659 and for problems sleeping .638. Among boys, the corresponding eigenvalue was 2,758, variance explained 46% and component loading ranged between .650 – .725. Among girls, the eigenvalue was 2,501, variance explained 42% and component factor loading ranged between .603 – .686.

Thereafter a computation of an index of psychosomatic symptoms was done to find adolescents with several PSC. Also, the index was dichotomised into few symptoms and severe symptoms (> 1 S.D. from mean). Each item was also dichotomised to often/sometimes and seldom/never.

When answering the items in Antonovsky's short, 13-items version, each individual receives a score ranging from 13 to 91. Four equally large groups were created: strong, fairly strong, fairly weak and weak SOC: to incorporate a SOC in the hypothesised model.

The short version of the SOC scale has been shown in a systematic review of 127 studies to have a Cronbach's α with a range from 0.70–0.92 and a one-year test-retest correlation of 0.69–0.78 [20]. In the present study the Cronbach's α for all 13 items were 0.860.

This study has followed the recommendations and principles of the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research. In summary, the recommendations include that a person, who participates in research as a subject should be protected against the risk of physical injury, mental injury or the violation of their integrity. To the extent that the research can involve risks for the subjects of the research, there should be an investigation that includes, among other things, a weighing-up of the risks involved against the knowledge gained. High standards should be insisted upon with respect to the quality of the research and to ensure that the subjects involved have understood and accepted the conditions that apply to their participation.

Statistical analysis

There were five statistical procedures performed using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) version 15.0 for Windows:

A χ2 test to determine if there was an association between the psychosocial background factors and psychosomatic complains.

Bivariate correlation procedure computing Pearson's correlation coefficient or Pearson's r to determine if there was a covariance between the psychosomatic symptoms.

An one-way ANOVA (post hoc. Tukey's test) to test if the means in the psychosomatic index varied with the quartiles in SOC.

Factor analysis to analyse the relation between the psychosomatic variables to identify groups with similar symptoms.

Binary logistic regression to control for the influence of various social conditions. The logistic regression resulted in an odds ratio. The R2coefficient, a measure of strength of the association in the models used in this study was Nagelkerke R2.

Results

The distribution of psychosocial background factors is shown in Table 1. Approximately the same proportion of adolescents had families in which both parents and the child came from abroad (7,0%) as were born in Sweden with foreign parents (5,9%). Roughly one out of four (27%) of the adolescents lived in block of flats and three out of ten (33%) came from families with separated parents. Parental unemployment was reported by 14–15% of the adolescents.
Table 1

Social background factors among 2023 boys and 1975 girls 16 and 19 year-old in Västmanland County, Sweden

Background factors

Boys N = 2023

(%)

Girls N = 1975

(%)

Ethnicity

    

Parents and child from Sweden

1664

82.3

1645

83.3

Child born in Sweden, parents from abroad

117

5.8

120

6.1

Both child and parents from abroad

151

7.5

127

6.4

Residential type

    

Private residence

1458

72.1

1432

72.5

Rented flat or apartment

557

27.5

531

26.9

Family constellation

    

Nuclear family

1335

66.0

1333

67.5

Separated family

677

33.5

638

32.3

Parental employment

    

Both parents working

1629

80.5

1587

80.4

At least one non-working parent

297

14.7

287

14.5

Note: Numbers may vary slightly due to missing data for specific variables

The distribution, by gender and age, of the reported symptoms is described in Table 2. There was a gender difference in the symptoms reported, with the boys reporting fewer and less frequent symptoms than the girls. The most common symptoms among the girls were headache and feeling irritated, while the boys reported feeling irritated and having sleeping problems.
Table 2

Number and proportion of reported psychosomatic complaints among 16 and 19 year-old boys and girls, Västmanland County, Sweden

 

Boys 16 years

N = 1078

Boys 19 years

N = 964

 

Often

Sometimes

Seldom

Never

Often

Sometimes

Seldom

Never

 

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

Headache

76

7

312

29

462

43

228

21

76

8

253

27

405

42

219

23

Stomachache

34

3

245

23

502

47

297

28

57

6

179

19

415

43

302

32

Feeling irritated

175

16

439

41

333

31

131

12

141

15

411

43

305

32

96

10

Nervousness

59

5

311

29

468

43

240

22

56

6

279

30

431

45

187

20

Problem sleeping

117

11

219

20

339

31

403

37

115

12

208

22

338

35

292

31

Dizziness

54

5

133

12

354

33

532

50

24

3

104

11

292

31

530

56

 

Girls 16 years

N = 1029

Girls 19 years

N = 953

 

Often

Sometimes

Seldom

Never

Often

Sometimes

Seldom

Never

 

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

Headache

194

19

459

45

297

29

79

8

250

26

399

41

243

25

72

7

Stomachache

127

12

441

43

368

36

93

9

174

18

355

37

353

37

82

8

Feeling irritated

285

28

491

48

213

21

40

4

280

29

499

52

164

17

21

2

Nervousness

129

12

382

37

407

40

111

11

164

17

393

41

330

34

77

8

Problem sleeping

139

13

241

23

352

34

297

29

176

18

281

29

301

31

206

21

Dizziness

86

8

173

17

345

34

406

40

72

8

200

21

310

32

379

39

The distribution of psychosomatic symptoms related to psychosocial background factors varied with gender, as can be seen in Table 3. According to the severe PSC symptom dichotomization (>1 SD) there were significantly more girls affected by PSC, (χ2 = 179.322, df = 1, p < 0.001) Among the boys, 9% have regular PSC as compared to 25% among the girls. In our study we found that severe PSC (> 1 S.D. from mean) among both boys and girls was significantly related to all the psychosocial background factors, i.e. ethnicity, residential type, family constellation and parental employment.
Table 3

Social background factors associated with severe psychosomatic symptoms among 16 and 19-year old boys and girls Västmanland county, Sweden

Background factor

Severe psychosomatic symptoms >1 SD from mean

 

Boys N = 2023

Girls N = 1975

 

n

% (C.I)

n

% (C.I)

Total

190

9.4 (8.1–10.7)

502

25.4 (23.4–27.4)

Ethnicity

    

Parents and child from Sweden

146

8.8 (7.4–10.2)

407

24.7 (22.6–26.8)

Child born in Sweden parents from abroad

9

7.7 (2.9–12.5)

31

25.8 (18.0–33.6)

Both child and parents from abroad

24

15.9 (10.0–21.8)

43

33.9 (25.7–42.1)

Residential type

    

"Own house"

122

8.4 (7.0–9.8)

328

22.9 (20.7–25.1)

Flat or apartment

66

11.8 (9.1–14.5)

173

32.6 (28.6–36.8)

Family constellation

    

"Nuclear family"

112

8.4 (6.9–9.9)

320

24.0 (21.7–26.3)

Separated family

77

11.4 (9.0–13.8)

180

28.2 (24.7–31.7)

Parental employment

    

Working parents

142

8.7 (7.3–10.1)

380

23.9 (21.8–26.0)

At least one non-working parent

39

13.1 (9.3–16.9)

95

33.1 (30.8–35.4)

Note: Numbers may vary slightly due to non-response for specific variables

Besides the difference in the reported prevalence of symptoms, there was also a gender difference in the SOC scores. The girls scored lower than the boys in both age groups. The sixteen-year-old boys had a mean SOC score of 61.10 (S.D. = 12.14) while the nineteen-year-old boys had a mean score of 62.5 (S.D. = 12.33). The girls had a mean score of 59.0 (S.D. = 13.41) for the sixteen year olds and the nineteen-year-old girls had a mean score of 58.5 (S.D. = 12.01).

A bivariate correlation procedure computing Pearson's correlation coefficient or Pearson's r to determine the covariance between the psychosomatic symptoms was done. There was a weak association, between the psychosomatic symptoms, with values ranging between .489 and .281. The symptoms grouped themselves as follows: headache to stomach ache, feeling irritated to nervousness and problem sleeping to dizziness.

Table 4 illustrates that the stronger the SOC the lesser proportion of adolescents that can be classified as having severe PSC and vice versa (p < 0.001 among both sexes). Almost one out of ten boys and just over one out of four girls reported having severe PSC. In addition, in each SOC-subgroup girls had more than double proportions of severe PSC than boys. In the group of adolescent with the weakest SOC, more than 21% of the boys reported to have severe PSC in comparison to the more than 51% of the girls.
Table 4

Sense of Coherence associated with severe psychosomatic symptoms among 16 and 19-year-old boys and girls in Västmanland County, Sweden.

SOC

Severe psychosomatic symptoms >1 SD from mean

Sense of coherence score limits classified by quartile

 

Boys

Girls

Boys

Girls

 

n

%

n

%

  

Total

190

9.4

502

25.4

  

Strong SOC

10

1.8

45

9.2

73–91

70–91

Fairly strong SOC

16

3.2

72

14.1

63–72

60–69

Fairly weak SOC

53

11.3

121

26.1

54–62

51–59

Weak SOC

111

21.7

264

51.6

13–53

16–50

  

*

 

*

  

* = p < .001

The one-way ANOVA (post hoc Tukey's test) showed that there was a significant association between the SOC quartiles and the psychosomatic index as shown in Table 5.
Table 5

Relation between mean SOC and PSC index. One way ANOVA (post hoc. Tukey's test)

 

Boys

Girls

Total

 

16 years of age

19 years of age

16 years of age

19 years of age

 

Strong SOC

10,9769*

11,0405*

12,6360*

13,6467*

11,8765*

Fairly strong SOC

12,561*

12,2895*

14,4248*

14,5226*

13,3998*

Fairly weak SOC

13,77657*

13,3457*

15,5086*

15,7556*

14,5682*

Weak SOC

14,91213*

14,9742*

16,9412*

17,9848*

16,4466*

* = p < .01

Table 6 shows the logistic analyses that were performed using the two models. In the first model, model A, SOC was tested in relation to PSC, and in model B, adjustment for psychosocial background factors was made. In the logistic model A, we found that the category of adolescents that reported many and severe psychosomatic complains was significantly related to SOC-quartiles. The same pattern was found when the model was adjusted for psychosocial background factors; model B. All psychosocial background factors had a non-significant relation too psychosomatic complaints when adjusted for SOC, except among girls from blocks of flats who had an increased risk for psychosomatic complaints (p = 0.046 OR 1.3) (not shown in figure). As shown in the table, adolescent boys with weak SOC had an increased risk of 14.7 times (unadjusted) to 16.4 times (adjusted) for experiences of severe PSC in comparison with boys with strong SOC (the reference category). The corresponding elevated risk for girls with weak SOC was 9.9 (adjusted) and 10.5 (unadjusted). Our SOC-models explained 16–20% of severe psychosomatic complaints present among the 16- and 19-year-old adolescents.
Table 6

Logistic regression analysis of two models of Sense of Coherence and psychosocial complains in boys and girls in Västmanland county, Sweden.

 

Many/severe psychosocial complains

Boys

Many/severe psychosocial complains

Girls

Sense of Coherence

n

Odds ratio Model A (C.I.)

Odds ratio Model B (C.I.)

n

Odds ratio Model A (C.I.)

Odds ratio Model B (C.I.)

Strong

541

1.0

1.0

490

1.0

1.0

Medium strong

502

1.7 (0.8–3.9)

2.1 (0.8–4.9)

509

1.6 (1.1–2.4)

1.7 (1.1–2.6)

Medium weak

469

6.8 (3.4–13.5)

7.3 (3.4–15.7)

464

3.5 (2.4–5.1)

3.5 (2.4–5.2)

Weak

511

14.7 (7.6–28.5)

16.4 (7.9–34.3)

512

10.5 (7.4–15.0)

9.9 (6.8–14.3)

  

R2 .157

R2 .167

 

R2 .196

R2 .193

R2 Nagelkerke

Models

A) No adjustment

B) Adjusted for ethnicity, residential type, family constellation, parental employment

Discussion

The results from our study showed that there was a statistically significant association between PSC and SOC, and also that lower SOC was associated with a higher prevalence of PSC. Adolescent boys with a weak SOC had an increased risk for severe psychosomatic symptoms, 15 times higher than boys with a high SOC. The corresponding risk-elevation among girls was 10 times. Conversely, higher SOC was associated with a lower prevalence of PSC. The findings in our study suggest that a strong SOC can help adolescents choose a coping strategy that is appropriate for the situation and thereby may prevent them from developing PSC, which is in line with other authors findings [21, 22].

Our results also indicate that the psychosocial background factors used in this study do not in any meaningful way explain the variation in psychosomatic complains, when controlling for SOC. Instead, the reverse pattern was found in which the SOC variable out-ruled the traditional psychosocial risk factors in our model. Consequently, this does not exclude the possibility that there are other psychosocial factors that could influence or explain the variation in PSC.

In an earlier study it was found that 25% of the children in the Nordic countries had at least one PSC occurring every week or every other week, with a higher prevalence among girls [23]. The most common complaints were headache and stomachache. It also showed that there are several factors related to PSC. These factors can be found at the child, family and socio-economic level [13]. In our study, we also found the same pattern with headache and stomachache as the most common complaints, of gender difference, with more PSC among girls. The proportion of adolescents that reported PSC was similar to the proportion found in the aforementioned study. In an unpublished study, we found that the proportion of girls with PSC increased from 14 to 21% during a 10-year period, while there was no increase in PSC among the boys.

Total SOC scores are normally lower for women than for men. The reason for this is not clear. However it has been suggested that the SOC scale could be based on a way of reasoning that is more relevant for women than men, as men and women have different coping strategies. Men tend to be more aggressive and presumptuous, while women are more reflective and emotional [24].

McSherry and Holm showed in their study that not only are low SOC individuals more psychologically distressed prior to a stressful situation, but they also maintained these higher levels of distress after stressful experience as well [25, 26]. Although the levels of distress showed significant pre and post increases for all three SOC groups, the low SOC group began and ended the experiment as the most distressed. This could be a part of the explanation why individuals with low SOC develop more psychosomatic symptoms, as the results from our study have shown.

Geyer discussed in his paper the statistical relationship between SOC and symptoms/disease [27]. He concluded that due to the simultaneous assessment of variables, it is open to debate whether a low SOC has some effect on the probability of falling ill or whether it is the other way around.

Our results indicate that SOC has an effect on the development of psychosomatic symptoms, as almost no psychosocial background factors explained any difference, when controlling for SOC. Instead, all psychosocial factors had significant relation to PSC if not controlled for SOC.

SOC could be interpreted as an autonomous resource contributing to a favourable development of subjective state of health. SOC data should; however, be regarded as complementary to and not a substitute for information already known to be associated with increased risk of future ill health [27]. Other authors report that SOC was not found to be a buffering variable [28].

All these measures are self-reported and therefore subject to reporting bias. Self-reported data are also considered to have questionable validity in many cases, especially survey questions about socially unacceptable behaviour. Questions about somatic and psychological symptoms are also difficult to validate in a cross-sectional study with a potential for under- or over-reporting that could lead to an inflation of the estimates of PSC in our study. Complementary interviews would have been preferred, but this was not feasible due to the large sample size and the confidential nature of the survey. There were no missing data analyses performed.

The strengths of this study are the large sample, the high response rate and the use of commonly used and tested measures. As the data was sampled during a lesson-hour under the surveillance of a teacher, the situation was controlled. However, with an external non-response rate of 16% (820 students) and an internal non-response rate that varied between 1 to 3% the students not attending the school during the period the survey was conducted may introduce a response bias. Non-respondents may also be more likely to suffer from PSC, hence leading to less statistical power in detecting this potential response bias.

The data from the adolescents in this study represent only one county in Sweden and this may limit our ability to make generalisations. The county does not, however, differ from other counties with regard to socio-economic or demographic factors.

Our results only represent relations among variables and not causations. The relations presented are associative, given that conclusions regarding the directions of cause and effect must be considered tentative. It is possible that a person who developed severe PSC has weakened ability to develop a strong SOC or coping ability, or that there are other, yet unknown factors that might be related to both SOC and PSC. These factors could be a genetic predisposition or environmental or cultural influences, as well as other psychosocial factors than those used in our study. As this study is one of the first studies to examine the association between SOC and PSC in an adolescent population, both a replications of this study and these analyses in different settings would be needed as is longitudinal study to follow the secular trend of PSC in adolescents.

In summary our study shows that adolescents with weak SOC report more psychosomatic symptoms than adolescents with a strong SOC. We also found that SOC ruled out traditional psychosocial risk factors, indicating that SOC is an intervening variable that mediates psychosocial risks in relation to PSC.

Notes

Abbreviations

SOC: 

sense of coherence

PSC: 

psychosomatic complaints

S.D.: 

standard deviation.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The study was fully financed by the County Council of Västmanland

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Community Medicine, County Council of Västmanland
(2)
Centre for Clinical Research, Uppsala University, Central Hospital
(3)
Department of International Health (IHCAR), Karolinska Institute

References

  1. Sells CW, Blum RV: Morbidity and mortality among US adolescents: an overview of data and trends. Am J Public Health. 1996, 86: 513-519.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett DL, Bauman A: Adolescent mental health and risky sexual behaviour. BMJ. 2000, 321: 251-252. 10.1136/bmj.321.7256.251.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Viner R, Booy R: Clinical review: ABC of adolescence, Epidemiology of health and illness. BMJ. 2005, 330: 411-414. 10.1136/bmj.330.7488.411.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Brill SR, Patel DR, MacDonald E: Psychosomatic disorders in paediatrics. Indian J Pediatr. 2001, 68: 597-603. 10.1007/BF02752270.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Aro H: Life stress and psychosomatic symptoms among 14 to 16-year-old Finnish adolescents. Psychol Med. 1987, 17: 191-201.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Takata Y: Research on psychosomatic complaints by senior high school students in Tokyo and their related factors. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2001, 55: 3-11. 10.1046/j.1440-1819.2001.00777.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Erginoz E, Alikasifoglu M, Ercan O, Uysal O, Ercan G, Albayrak Kaymak D, Ilter O: Perceived health status in a Turkish adolescent sample: risk and protective factors. Eur J Pediatr. 2004, 163: 485-94. 10.1007/s00431-004-1446-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Buddeberg-Fischer B, Klaghofer R, Leuthold A, Buddeberg C: School climate and psychological symptoms – correlation's between school stress, sense of coherence and physical-psychological impairment in high school students. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2000, 50: 222-9. 10.1055/s-2000-13250. (Article in German)View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Due P, Lynch J, Holstein B, Modvig J: Socioeconomic health inequalities among a nationally representative sample of Danish adolescents: the role of different types of social relations. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003, 57: 692-8. 10.1136/jech.57.9.692.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Young people's health in context. Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study: international report from the 2001/2002 survey. Edited by: Candace Currie, Chris Roberts, Antony Morgan, Rebecca Smith, Wolfgang Settertobulte, Oddrun Samdal, Vivian Barnekow Rasmussen. Health Policy for Children and Adolescents, No. 4, WHO Europe Copenhagen
  11. Tanaka H, Möllborg P, Terashima S, Borres MP: Comparison between Japanese and Swedish schoolchildren in regards to physical symptoms and psychiatric complaints. Acta Pediatr. 2005, 94 (11): 1661-1666. 10.1080/08035250510044562.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Kristensson P, Öhlund LS: Swedish upper secondary school pupils' sense of coherence, coping resources and aggressiveness in relation to educational track and performance. Scand J Caring Sci. 2005, 19: 77-84. 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2005.00320.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Antonovsky A: Unravelling the mystery of health. First edition. 1987, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass PublisherGoogle Scholar
  14. Antonovsky A: The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Soc Sci Med. 1993, 36: 725-33. 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90033-Z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Berg I-M, Simonsson B, Brantefors B, Ringqvist I: Prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adolescents in a county in Sweden. Acta Paediatr. 2001, 90: 671-676.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Berg I-M, Simonsson B, Ringqvist I: Social background, aspects of lifestyle, body image, relations, school situation and somatic and psychological symptoms in overweight and obese 15-year old boys in a county in Sweden. Scan J Prim Health Care. 2005, 23 (2): 95-101. 10.1080/02813430510015313.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Nilsson KW, Starrin B, Simonsson B, Leppert J: Alcohol-related problems among adolescents and the role of a sense of coherence. Int J Soc Welfare. 2007, 16: 159-167. 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2006.00452.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Sjöberg RL, Nilsson KW, Leppert J: Obesity, shame, and depression in school-aged children: a population-based study. Pediatrics. 2005, 116: e389-92. 10.1542/peds.2005-0170.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Aslund C, Nilsson KW, Starrin B, Sjöberg RL: Shaming experiences and the association between adolescent depression and psychosocial risk factors. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2007, 16: 298-304. 10.1007/s00787-006-0564-1. Epub 2007 Apr 30View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Eriksson M, Lindström B: Validity of Antonovsky's sense of coherence scale: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005, 59: 460-6. 10.1136/jech.2003.018085.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Bishop GD: The sense of coherence as a resource in dealing with stress. Psychologia. 1993, 36: 259-263.Google Scholar
  22. Buddeberg-Fischer B, Klaghofer R, Snyder U: Sense of coherence in adolescents. Soz Praventivmed. 2001, 46: 404-10. 10.1007/BF01321667.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Berntsson LT, Köhler L, Gustafsson JE: Psychosomatic complaints in schoolchildren: a Nordic comparison. Scand J Public Health. 2001, 29: 44-54. 10.1080/14034940151107028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gibson LM, Cook MJ: Do health questionnaires which do not consider sex differences miss important information?. Psychological Reports. 1997, 81: 163-171.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. McSherry WC, Holm JE: Sense of coherence: Its effects on psychological and physiological process prior to, during, and after a stressful event. J Clin Psychology. 1994, 50: 476-487. 10.1002/1097-4679(199407)50:4<476::AID-JCLP2270500402>3.0.CO;2-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Smith TL, Meyers LS: The sense of coherence Its relationship to personality, stress and health measures. J Personality and Social Behaviour and Personality. 1997, 12: 513-51.Google Scholar
  27. Geyer S: Some conceptual considerations on the sense of coherence. Soc Sci Med. 1997, 44: 1771-9. 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00286-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Suominen S, Helenius H, Blomberg H, Uutela A, Koskenvuo M: Sense of coherence as a predictor of subjective state of health. Results of 4 years of follow-up of adults. J Psychosom Res. 2001, 50: 77-86. 10.1016/S0022-3999(00)00216-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Simonsson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement